• @rsuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    010 months ago

    Now imagine this happens in a remote area with no cell coverage. In Arizona those are a thing too.

    • @LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Easy enough to get out, if you have a couple braincells to rub together. The manual release is not hidden, covered, obfuscated, or even in a weird location. It’s literally right on the door handle

      Edit: turns out this is only in the M3, the Y, X, And CT are all designed by absolute idiots, and i joined them by not looking into all models

    • @MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      No need for remoteness. Imagine you drive into water or battery catches fire. You aren’t opening those doors.

        • @MeanEYE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          No you are not. People panic and default to most common behavior, this is why emergency exercises are a thing. In other words, the hidden manual release somewhere in the car that was never used is not going to be used in the moment of panic. You won’t even remember it exists.

          Also, that’s only on some cars and only in the front. None on the back seat.

          • @LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            It is not hidden, covered, obfuscated, or even in a weird location. It’s literally sitting right on the door handle. Also even with a standard 1990 car with fully manual doors you are not going to be escaping out the doors if your car falls into water. The pressure differential of the water pushing against your door prevents you from opening it until the entire inside of the car has filled with water, MythBusters did a whole episode on this back in the day if you want to go find that for the full story. But the tldr is that once your car is in the water you’re only Escape options are to break the window, get the window rolled down, or wait until the entire car has filled with water and the pressure equalizes

            Edit: turns out this is only in the M3, the Y, X, And CT are all designed by absolute idiots, and i joined them by not looking into all models

      • @MeanEYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        Yes. You go out to grab a rock, go back in and smash the windows. Or keep one tactical door opening rock beneath the seat.

        • Morphit
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          beneath the seat

          For the toddler to use?

          There is a mechanical door release if you’re trapped inside. To get in from outside obviously needs the vehicle to unlock, so it has to be jump started.

          Even if there was some kind of back-up mechanical lock I can’t see anyone carrying around a key only for this specific eventuality. A glass breaker key-ring might be the best option — along with understanding how to use these emergency features in case you need them. A glass breaker might also save you in a fire or ending up underwater.

          • @lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            010 months ago

            To get in from outside obviously needs the vehicle to unlock, so it has to be jump started.

            and how do you get to the battery to do that if you can’t get inside?

            • Morphit
              link
              fedilink
              English
              010 months ago

              That is fun, I didn’t know that was a thing. I imagine that roll-overs are more common than submersion in water, but even so, that doesn’t sound like a great trade-off. Even in a crash, being able to quickly jump out the window is good — especially if the vehicle is on fire.

            • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘
              link
              fedilink
              English
              010 months ago

              These two remind me of the early Apple fanboys, completely talking around all the bad parts and focusing only on perceived good parts. Except, here, they’re fan-ing on a decision that was made a long time ago (using tempered glass on side windows) for exactly the reason they state is ‘bad’–it explodes into a bunch of non-sharp shards. This decision was made, and agreed upon by auto manufacturers, to prevent people getting stuck in cars on fire. Internal mechanical releases do nothing when the person inside is unconscious or is a toddler, as is in this case.

          • @MeanEYE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Mechanical release is hidden and not commonly used, or if ever. In moments of utter panic people will not even remember it exists, let alone use it.

            • Morphit
              link
              fedilink
              English
              010 months ago

              The front ones don’t seem to be hidden, but yeah - if they’re not meant to be used regularly, people won’t remember them in an emergency. I guess the rear ones are hidden because they probably bypass child-locks.

              I don’t know how child-locks work on mechanical door latches. If the vehicle locks when in motion and the child-locks are on I don’t think there are emergency releases on most vehicles? The only ways out would be to get into the front cabin, break the windows, or find the internal boot release.

    • @Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      In the middle of nowhere, maybe. But I’ve been on several road trips across the state and had service the entire way, mostly LTE with a few spots of 3G here and there. As long as you’re near the highway or a town, you’ll get service.

      • @PlutoParty@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        There are giant swaths of area with no coverage, especially in the mountains of arizona, including the freeways and especially highways. The entire western US can be spotty with signal out in the great wide open. It isn’t until the Midwest and more east that one should largely not worry about signal coverage anymore.

  • Admiral Patrick
    link
    fedilink
    English
    010 months ago

    If only we had the technology to open doors without power. One day, perhaps.

    • Neato
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      The fact a car was approved that doesn’t have a manual way to open doors from inside and outside and start it is ludicrous. That’s basic-ass level shit. NHTSA is asleep at the wheel.

      • @qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        Other comment says there is a way from inside, just not outside (which doesn’t help with a young kid/toddler/baby is the inside passenger of course).

        Either way, glad this is “only” a huge embarrassment, and not a dead kid.

      • Toes♀
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        Oh that’s easy, just make it a one time release switch. You gotta replace the door battery after using it.

        • @jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          Door opener fluid. It’s a canister of fluid that you have to pump into the door to open it in an emergency. Then you get a replacement canister from the dealer for $150. I recently found out that that’s what passes for a “spare tire” anymore.

          • @nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            010 months ago

            They do they both for cost and for weight savings to try and hit CAFE standard while only selling oversized CUVs.

            Make small cars.

            We want them, they’re fun and better for everyone.

    • @dgmib@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      There is a manual door release that works without power, but only from the inside. She had just loaded the child in their car seat, shut the door then went to the driver door to get in and couldn’t open it.

      The doors are on the 12V side of the system, you can use jumper cables to connect an external battery from another vehicle (including ICE vehicles) to power the door under normal circumstances. But with a kid trapped in the car in AZ, I wouldn’t wait for that either.

      It a pretty rare combinations of circumstances, but there’s something to be said for manual keys still used on other vehicles with keyless entry.

    • meseek #2982
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      Or the foresight to have a small backup battery unit used exclusively for emergencies like say when the battery goes out or when someone reverses their car into a lake. The fact these are such death traps shows just how bad the US is when it comes to giving a flying fuck about people over money.

      And all the while Elon is touted as some kind of super Lex Lutherian genius.

      Honestly if I wrote a fictional book with some of the shit he’s done and how the world looks at him publishers would throw it back in my face as being the most unbelievable POS they’ve read in the past 20 years.

      • mesa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        I still dont like something that is electric powered making it so you cant get through a door. If there is a short, the battery dies (which it will someday) or generally bad parts could potentially lead to a preventable death. Cars were made so keys (or key like) can open the door no matter what. And especially in the heat everyone is going through in the US.

  • @AceBonobo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    010 months ago

    I’d love to see a crank on EVs to power the low voltage stuff in emergencies. How many amps does the car startup take? 15A? Maybe bicycle pedals.

  • @ForgottenFlux@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    010 months ago

    According to a report from Arizona’s Family:

    The 12-volt battery that powers the car’s electronics died without warning.

    Tesla drivers are supposed to receive three warnings before that happens, but the Tesla service department confirmed that Sanchez didn’t receive any warnings.

    • @explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      Even if she did receive warnings, she’s a grandmother who easily could miss one of the many messages on the car. It’s just bad design.

          • @AbidanYre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            010 months ago

            You said other manufacturers fail at “this” referring to the 12v battery dying, but the context here is a child being trapped in a car when that battery fails. If the 12v battery fails on any other car you simply pull the handle and the door opens.

      • @ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        What? No they aren’t. They almost always fail on a curve of power and voltage loss.

        Also, I didn’t look it up, but I’d be very surprised if the model Y tesla didn’t require (suggest and oem?) an AGM battery. It’s still lead, but due to how they’re made they can’t get a dead short in them like older regular lead acid batteries can once they get old, although it still isn’t very common for it to happen.

          • @ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            010 months ago

            No they aren’t. They degrade before they fail. If tesla wanted to provide a warning of a failing battery that pretty much always worked it could have wired in a load test and went off voltage drop under a heavier load.

            Testing if batteries are good or bad does not qualify a person to chart out battery degradation.

              • @ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                010 months ago

                Once again, I did this for a living, for a decade. We would constantly have cars with failed batteries, we would bring them in, charge them up, test them, they would pass, we’d send them on their way, and they would fail again

                I also test batteries and this just looks like you all didn’t test them well. Like you skipped the capacity test because it takes being hooked up for a long time instead of the test that takes 20 seconds to do.

  • Cyborganism
    link
    fedilink
    English
    010 months ago

    My 1998 Honda Civic SE hatchback was all manual. Manual windows with the canks, manual door locks, manual steering (no power steering), no braking assist, no assist of ANY kind in fact, and a manual transmission. It was basically an engine, four wheels and a steering wheel.

    If EV manufacturers could make cars that are closer to my old Civic, with the only difference being the engine being swapped for an electric motor, I would switch in a heartbeat. For now I’ll stick with my 2010 Mazda 3, which I barely use except for the occasional trip to my family or friends who are out of the city or to do my groceries once a week. Until cars start using manual controls for essentials like door handles and locks, audio systems and temperature control, I want none of it.

    I’m already having trouble with touch screen tablets when I’m not driving, let alone when I need to focus on the damn road.

  • @TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    010 months ago

    Wish Version Iron Man:

    "Really? Do you think its 2010 again?

    This is the fuuuuuuttttuuurrreeee!!!"

    snorts Ketamine and twirls out the door

  • @ramenshaman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    010 months ago

    Really interesting design decision. Was the main battery also dead? I’m guessing not. There’s a step-down converter under the rear seat that outputs 12-16 volts, Tesla could probably have fairly easily set the car up to power the doors from that when the auxiliary 12V battery dies.

    • @Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      Probably would still need the 12V battery to have enough charge to close the connection to the high voltage battery that would power the step down converter.

      But yeah it seems dumb to me that most EVs don’t keep the 12V battery topped up from the high voltage battery somehow while the car is parked, but I’m not an electrical engineer ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • @frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        There really shouldn’t need to be a 12V battery at all. Stepping the voltage down isn’t that complicated, but the supply chain for the necessary parts aren’t there for the car industry.

        Plus, it’d be really nice if everything could run off a 48V line instead of 12V. The wires can be thinner due to less current draw. Getting that to work across all the electronics for everything is a whole separate level, though.

        • @histic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          You don’t want to fully drain the main battery as it would do severe damage to it and most of the 12v system has a phantom draw of power so to keep the main battery from running out they have a separate one

            • @histic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              010 months ago

              That’s not the point the fact is that there is some dumbass that probably will let it sit at 0% and kill the battery

              • @frezik@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                010 months ago

                Battery management electronics don’t let you drain lithium batteries to 0%. It’s a severe design flaw if it does.

        • @Venator@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          There really shouldn’t need to be a 12V battery at all

          I think it’s mainly there just to be able to control the circuit that cuts power to the high voltage battery off while the car is parked for safety reasons.

  • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    010 months ago

    Failsafe.

    Fail Safe.

    Fail Open.

    Elon is why we need to write safety regulations. He’s the kind of guy who would put sawdust in your food and call it innovation.

    • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      Agree on your overall sentiment, though I’d say it is a bit more complicated than that for car doors. You don’t want it to fail and come open while moving, for example, especially if the car is coming to a stop and inertia forces the doors fully open. That Boeing door failed open and it was not very safe.

      Vehicle doors should be fail functional rather than open to fail safe. As in designed to be very unlikely to fail and/or still functional even if one or several components do fail.

      • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        Sure, for the electrical part. But the door as a whole should Fail Open. You can pull over with an open door. You should not have to break the door to escape after a failure.

        • @petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          I think the point, though, is there should be a redundant system to handle failures, like a mechanical-only door handle.

          Another example: your dashboard touchscreen fails, there should still be a button to turn on the AC. Or off. Whatever makes this analogous to the safety concern about doors.

      • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Two options:

        • your statement comes off a bit ignorant - a failsafe would just pop the latch (and up and down motion) and wouldn’t be impacted by braking forces (front and back motion)
        • you weren’t explicitly saying bad things about Elon Musk

        But the general idea of things still working despite failure is the essence of what the OP was saying. People seem to not like comments that refine what others say (I have plenty of experience there), they prefer comments that either correct or blatantly support the parent comment. I don’t get it, but whatever.

        • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          For the fail-safe bit, if the latching system fails to an unlatched position, then the inertia of the door itself could cause it to open on braking and turns (or if someone leans on it or bumps it), since nothing else would be holding it in place.

          Obligatory fuck Elon Musk lol.

          It’s not generally as bad here as it is on Reddit. I still see the occasional comments that make me wonder if their author has any reading comprehension skills, but Reddit seemed to have representation from those kinds of posters in most comment threads. Even on the topics where Lemmy has general biases for, comments can still go off the beaten trail without getting crucified.

          Though with the smaller sample size of voters, I think Lemmy might see more cases where a comment initially goes one way and then swings the other way, which seems to be the case with my comment above, at least for now (and is part of the reason why I try to refrain from ever commenting on the votes, but usually there’s also a spicy or bolder part of my comment where I’m not as surprised if it goes negative).

        • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          09 months ago

          Car doors that aren’t on teslas don’t fail open, they are reliable enough that I can’t think of hearing about any failures that don’t involve a collision and deforming of the door (in which case it’s a fail closed and they use the jaws of life to get people out, or another door).

          An electronic latch is either engaged or it isn’t. Fail open would mean that in the absence of an electronic signal saying it should be closed, the latch will default to not being engaged, which would mean there’s nothing holding the door closed if another force acts on it.

          Don’t assume any benefit of the doubt about Tesla’s. I made no comment one way or another about what I think of their doors vs other doors. For the record, I agree completely that they fucked up this part of the design. The purpose of my comment was to say that taking that design and adding “fail open” to it won’t fix it. Fail open and fail closed both have problems with an electronic latch and the only way to fix it without causing other big problems is to design it in a way that still functions as a door that can be open or latched closed whether or not the electronic part of the latch is working.

          And I’m “deliberately misinterpreting” what fail open means? I’m having trouble understanding how it can mean anything other than how I’m interpreting it, even with your clarification, given the disagreement about other car doors failing open. Maybe it’s a misnomer that I’m misinterpreting but why are you assuming I’m doing this in bad faith?

          The downvotes themselves don’t matter, I asked because I wanted to know the reasoning behind them, well aware that bringing them up at all will probably result in more of them.

  • @linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    010 months ago

    Yeah, My volt battery is in the floor of the trunk. If the battery on the volt dies you can’t open the trunk easily. Physical locks in the doors are no problem but they didn’t put a keyhole on the damn trunk.

    You can pop the hood and access the jump terminals and then pop the trunk. You can also crawl into the back hatch from inside pull a panel off and pop the trunk.

  • @EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    010 months ago

    A lot of people are giving Tesla shit here, but surely there should be regulations in place to ensure something like this isn’t allowed to be released for public use?

    • @cRazi_man@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      Every eventuality can’t be covered by regulation. Sometimes you realise something can go disastrously wrong after someone is hurt. I wouldn’t be surprised if this never happened to other mechanical cars to never need regulation. Sometimes you need to wait for a stupid product to exist for someone to make a rule saying “stupid products shouldn’t exist”.

    • @Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      You’d think so, but who do you think pays huge sums of money every year to be allowed to sell death traps to the public?

    • @CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      Sure you’d think you wouldn’t need regulations that state that there should be a manual way to open your car door. Have we gotten that stupid? Why in god’s name would you not have that option? What happens if the battery dies and you can’t start the car? You can’t open the door to pop the hood to even jump it. With all the brilliant people that work at a company like Tesla and no one thought there should be a way to open the door from the outside if there’s no power?

      • @areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        They do have a manual way of opening the car door if memory serves. It’s just in a hard to find place where a toddler wouldn’t think to look. Either way it’s a bad design. Nothing wrong with manual door handles imo.

        • @LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          True, a toddler wouldn’t think to look directly on the door handle. Not really the type of place you’d expect to find a door release you know /s

          There is a lot of reasons to hate elon, and there is a lot of reasons to hate tesla. But it really pisses me off when people just make these circle jerk hate threads based on something they didn’t even spend half a second Googling. It just makes all the legitimate issues easier for people to blow off

          • @rooster_butt@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            010 months ago

            You keep replying with this shit to every comment. How do you expect a toddler in a child seat to use that lever? Mind you I do not close car doors with my kids inside due to my own paranoia of losing the keys or something, but it’s a horrible design flaw that you can’t open the car from outside when the 12v battery is dead.

            • @LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              010 months ago

              If the toddler is locked into their seat they likely aren’t opening any door regardless. This Is Us ignoring the fact that most rear doors have a child lock button that is usually activated at least most parents I’ve seen with toddlers generally activate that button.

              There are so many legitimate things to complain about here I’m just annoyed by people basically saying wow how does it not have a manual release, or why is it hidden. When it’s not.

              The real problem here is the lack of any external manual release. Obviously it would still need to somehow be locked with a key that is not electronic, but there should still be some type of manual release even if it’s on the bottom trim of the door for the sake of your Aesthetics or whatever. The complete and utter lack of any external manual release is the problem here but nobody is talking about that and is instead just making shit up about how there is no manual release for the inside, or it’s hidden, or difficult to use, I’m just tired of people making shit up.

        • @T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          The toddler was strapped into the seat at the time, so chances are that they would not be able to find and open the door that way anyhow.

        • @CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          They have one on the inside but not the outside. That’s why the mom couldn’t get into the vehicle or the firefighters and they had to take an axe to the window. How are you supposed to pop the hood to jump start your car if the battery is dead and you can’t get in the car because the battery is dead? It’s just a stupid design to not have a manual override.

      • @TeenieBopper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        Have we gotten that stupid?

        Something something “these regulations are written in blood” anecdote something something.

    • @TacticsConsort@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      Fun fact, a Tesla spokesperson describing the car’s features was talking about how they wanted something on the car that didn’t make it to final release and said “But sadly we couldn’t get that law changed”, which does… kind of imply that they lobbied the regulatory bodies into allowing this piece of shit to exist.

    • @LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      Only takes about a half second Google search to find out, it’s literally a handle right on the door. Just above the window switches. It’s not hidden, obfuscated, covered, or even in a weird spot

      • @Adanisi@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It was a fucking toddler trapped in the car you moron.

        It couldn’t be opened manually from the outside.

      • @LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        She died of stupid, the release is literally right on the door. It’s not hidden, obfuscated, covered, or in any way shape or form difficult to use. Just another idiot that didn’t bother learning what all the controls on their new card did.

        That being said, even with a manual release they most likely would have died anyway. As once your car is in the water unless you’re able to open the door basically instantaneously upon hitting the water you’re going to find that the door is impossible to open as the weight of the water will prevent it until such time as the car has filled with water to equalize the pressure. Generally speaking people that survive cars falling into water were able to get the window open, or just break it entirely. The door is almost never the Escape Route as it will not allow itself to be opened due to the difference in pressure

        • @piyuv@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          Was going to tell you that she didn’t die in a model 3 but you found out yourself!

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    010 months ago

    Whenever essential functions (e.g. access) are powered, they’re supposed to have manual overrides. I’m pretty sure this is a regulatory requirement even here in the States where we’re stupid and regulatory agencies are mostly captured.

    So WTF happened, Tesla? Where’s the manual override for when the battery fails?

        • @DBNinja@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          You can also “jump” the car to open it via a 12V access port in the front.

              • @Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                010 months ago

                Yeah…because breaking the window as your first option in an emergancy is a GREAT idea. No need for a manual handle with a key, right? What a stupid idea that would be.

                • FaceDeer
                  link
                  fedilink
                  010 months ago

                  It’s not your first option in an emergency. Normally you just open the door. Breaking the glass is several layers of things-not-working deep.

                • @catloaf@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  010 months ago

                  Tempered glass is designed to not be sharp when broken. But they break a window furthest from the person inside to limit damage.

                  They can also use some tools to remove the window in mostly one piece after cracking it, rather than smashing it and sending glass flying.

              • @AbidanYre@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                010 months ago

                They did

                The child was safely removed from the car after firefighters used an ax to smash through a window

                • @cybersandwich@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  010 months ago

                  I know.

                  My response was to the previous comment.

                  In a non Tesla, if someone is locked in a car, what happens? There isn’t some secret “let me in” button. You just break a window. This is a dumb story.

        • @Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          No. You just need to be able to exit without power. Getting back in mechanically isn’t a requirement.

          It should be, but it’s not.

    • @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      It’s basic safety for industrial plants to designate powered equipment as “fail open” or “fail closed” or on/off. It’s shocking that this wasn’t applied to Tesla cars.

      We really need an industry that performs industrial grade HAZOPs on consumer products and publishes a report for everyone to see.

  • dinckel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    010 months ago

    There should really be a law, requiring a certain list of mechanical things to exist on the car. So far, it’s only the emergency turn signals, and what, the mirrors? The door handles absolutely need to be on that list

    • Captain Aggravated
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      At least one door should open via a mechanical key and mechanical handle from the outside, and I firmly believe the internal door handles should all function mechanically as well. There shouldn’t be “usually you use a button but in an emergency this thing that looks like a bit of trim is the actual mechanical handle” that shouldn’t be allowable by code.

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        I saw a clip on Just Rolled In where a lady in a Lexus thought she was trapped in her car when the electrics failed, as did the firefighters who broke her window, despite there being manual releases on both the inside and the outside of the car.

        • Captain Aggravated
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          I spent enough time in aviation to know how much drilling it actually takes to teach people emergency procedures. If it’s different than what they usually do, it takes hours of practice. Even something as simple as finding and pulling a different door latch. If you’re stressed, even as stressed as “the doors won’t open the way I’m used to them otherwise everything is okay” your brain will just fail to pivot to the alternate procedures.

          Cars got so simple to use in the 90’s. Sure they were simpler machines in the 60’s but fuel injection eliminated chokes and other carburetor issues, automatic transmissions became ubiquitous, children can handle vehicles of this complexity. And now we’re making them more complicated for no actual reason, with electric door latches with manual backups and such, and it’s causing problems.