• @john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Yep. Citizens’ United guaranteed that by allowing corporations to funnel an unlimited amount of money into campaigns.

        Just a heads up, if spending wasting egregious amounts of money didn’t influence the outcome of elections, why would people do it?

  • @peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 months ago

    You don’t need to buy an entire company to control or profit from it… He’s really that dumb isn’t he. He could do the whole Black Rock thing and control every company in the world, instead he has this idea of just owning everything.

    I’m starting to suspect the price speculation of things he owns is by his own hand, nothing to do with the market whatsoever.

    • @cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      They lost it in CPUs, but I think they’re actually nailing it in GPUs though (for once(at least for the budget/entry level))

      • @ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        They have what, 2 models? And in the GPU market, they aren’t even a pimple on the fly on the ass of nVidia or AMD

        • @Peffse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 months ago

          I’ve personally seen on at least 5 different Intel models on store shelves. The A380, A580 and the A750. Now the B580 and B570. The A380 stuck around but the others sold out fast from what I saw.

          And though they aren’t nearly as large as the two giants, they seem to be aiming for and pleasing the under-served sub-$250 market. Though I wish they’d publish more official numbers. A 6 day slice from a retailer isn’t a great view on trends.

          • @john89@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            aiming for and pleasing the under-served sub-$250 market.

            It’s already served by iGPUs and used dGPUs.

            I shudder to think of the poor soul that is so clueless and not-actually-frugal that they look at their needs and say an intel dGPU is the best choice.

      • @john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        budget/entry level

        Shit nobody cares about because we have iGPUs for that purpose.

        • @cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 months ago

          iGPUs suck ass, better than they’ve been in the past, but for gaming they’re still just what you use while you wait to get a dGPU

          • @john89@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            iGPUs also do not “suck ass.” They’re built for purpose and fulfill that purpose quite well.

            If you’re gaming, you’re better off buying a used dGPU made by AMD or Nvidia than a new GPU made by intel. I legitimately pity the fool who is buying an intel dGPU for gaming over used or new options from the other two.

            But hey, I guess people like you need to feel different somehow so that’s what the market is there for.

          • @sheogorath@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            With handheld PCs’ resurgence, iGPUs are getting recognition. With my handheld PC, I can easily play most PC games, barring the latest AAA games, on it. It has basically transformed the way I play video games, and it is powered by a 12 CU RDNA 3 iGPU. I was blown away when it could play 2010s games at ultra settings, 1080p, 60 fps with just a 10-watt configured TDP.

            Especially the latest Ryzen HX395. It’s an APU with a 40 CU RDNA iGPU. I think the current development is going on that direction.

            • Cait
              link
              fedilink
              English
              03 months ago

              For handhelds, a 720p resolution is very adequate, but not for a 27" Monitor

      • @CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        Eh unless they have the most efficient overall, they won’t make inroads into the server market. The entry level laptop and desktop markets are getting smaller and has less margins.

          • @CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            03 months ago

            Do you mean the efficiency question? I’m just deducing if they were competitive in servers Intel would jump at that opportunity.

            As for the PC market, just looking at unit sales: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_share_of_personal_computer_vendors

            And as for margins, well the exact information is a bit hard to find but in general lower end products have tighter margins and the buyers for them are more price sensitive.

            • @Peffse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              03 months ago

              Oh sorry, yeah that was directed towards the comment that the desktop market is getting smaller. I’ve heard that “the desktop computer is dead” for over two decades now, so that wiki page is quite interesting.

              I’d love to see the 2024 number once it gets published, because the 2020/1 numbers are such an anomalies from COVID that it’s hard to tell if the market’s actually shrinking or just stabilizing.

  • @BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 months ago

    That would be a HUGE Conflict of Interest if he was also a Government Official overseeing things like Regulation and Contracts! Intel would be his THIRD or FOURTH or FIFTH company that would rely on Government Funding!

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/elon-musk-buying-intel-could-be-poor-outcome-says-citi-1034241743

    This is the only reputable outlet that had anything to say about it.

    They reference SemiAccurate as the source, which I have not heard of before, but seems to have a solid track record with accurate reporting.


    GET. FUCKED. MUSK.

    I have to say, having an all-AMD setup makes me feel slightly okay today, even though AMD is just another shit company. At least it’s not in the running to be owned by that fucking tool.

  • @VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Look at the way Tesla collects and treats customer data, and the way Musk seems to unilaterally abuse the control over the companies he owns for personal reasons.

    Now think about the capabilities of the Intel Management Engine that pretty much every Intel CPU requires.

    Bad vibes, I say.

    For those feeling out of the loop, see here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine

    Tldr - it’s a little always on processor, running a Minix OS, with direct access to all board devices including the Ethernet Controller.

    AMD has something similar in form of their Platform Security Processor.

  • Bakkoda
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 months ago

    Imagine being a business willing to risk everything getting involved with this lunatic lol

    If businesses nowadays were people we’d have interventions for them or lock them up for their own sake.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 months ago

    So he’ll pay again twice the amount of money, then run the company off a bigger cliff than it’s currently falling off already?

    I’ll heat up the popcorn

  • @DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Yep, he’ll do it, the Trump administration will rubber stamp it. He’ll probably just keep doing such. Who knows what will happen when someone has all the money on the planet.

    …I guess that person’s lineage just rules supreme however they like?

    • @Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      Elon is too self obsessed to properly train a successor.

      I bet he is the type that would want his mind uploaded and that entity to be given all the wealth.

    • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      That’s a ally reason to pick a piece of tech IMO. I buy exclusively AMD because they offer great value, especially since they support their sockets for a long time. For their GPUs, they have fantastic drivers on Linux.

      I honestly don’t care who owns them, I care that the quality is good for the price. I don’t find that to be true for Tesla, so I don’t own one. If he buys Intel, that won’t change my opinion of their products, I’ll still avoid them because he value isn’t there.

    • @cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      switch permanently to AMD

      So glad I switched to AM5 on my last main gaming rig rebuild last year lol

  • ThePowerOfGeek
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 months ago

    As if Intel doesn’t have enough problems. That dipshit buying them would probably destroy them.

    • @Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      I worked at intel for a while. It deserves to be destroyed. But I live in an area with a lot of well off intel employees. It could tank my house value among other major impacts to the community. Like I am sure he would kill the matching donation stuff which would be a significant reduction of the amount of money non profits get in this area. So I hope the destruction is slow enough for other chip companies in the area to absord some of the workers.

  • @schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 months ago

    Everyone is focusing on Musk but uh, Global Foundries wants to be involved in buying Intel?

    The same Global Foundries that’s utterly incapable of progressing their tech stack?

    The one AMD created when they got rid of their foundries and was happy to do so?

    That amuses the shit out of me.

    • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      AMD wasn’t quite “happy” to sell their fabs, it was necessitated because they were facing bankruptcy. People forget but the prevailing opinion was that AMD was going to bankrupt.

      I doubt Global Foundries is even in the position to buy Intel, they’d most likely want to give them a cash infusion in exchange for tech or for selling fabs (which intel would probably accept, since their fabs are currently under-utilised… they have too much capacity). That would be good for GF.