• Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      Anecdotal evidence would seem to suggest that DNA is not a particularly effective armor.

  • @inconel@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 months ago

    I skimmed the article, scrolled down but people hasn’t mentioned its mechanically Chain mail in atomic scale yet? Did I read it wrong?

    • Justin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      it’s very lightweight though, so it could reduce plastic usage by mass, by reinforcing plastic/other materials.

      There’s also no reason why polymers need to be made out of oil: See PLA, cellophane, viscose, etc.

    • @BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      I mean, we have tried to completely stop, or at least slow, the refinement of crude oil, because there’s so much fucking byproduct that is made from it and is subsequently recycled and converted into plastic. What else can we do with all that fucked up petroleum byproduct besides make it all into some form of usable plastic?

    • @KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      Whether or not it’s plastic isn’t as big an issue as whether or not it’s biodegradable within a realistic timeframe.

      • Justin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        everything is degradable with enough heat

    • Justin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      It would probably be strong enough, but not viable to manufacture.

      • @pahlimur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        Extreme doubt on strong enough. The author of this article barely understands the words they are using. Cool it strain hardens, so do so many other materials. Cool it’s tough like many other materials. Wow it has more links than others. No actual numbers about toughness, yield, ultimate strength, cycle limits, etc. It’s great research, but it absolutely isn’t going to magically solve the space elevator issue.

          • @pahlimur@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            03 months ago

            Any company will market that its ideas are possible. The article you linked is promising, but take it with a huge grain of salt. They are moving the goalposts the whole article. Flat graphene is a great material for space elevators, but it can’t currently be created without defects. Polycrystaline means the graphene created includes defects sort of. It means the graphene they created that is km’s long has shitloads of places where cycle loading will cause it to fail way under (like 10%) of its expected load carrying capacity.

      • @Nighed@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        The stronger the material the thinner it could be.

        There are a lot of properties in the word ‘stronger’ though.

  • @werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 months ago

    China, please respect this secret. Its made up with grapheme threads. Its impossible to understand exactly so we made a little picture with the molecules and such so you can’t copy it.

    • @chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      Hardness isn’t the best thing to have in armor. In fact, extreme hardness means extreme brittleness.

      Tensile strength is more desirable in armor. That’s the sort of strength that a string or rope, or Kevlar will have.

      Those can stretch a bit before breaking.

      Kevlar will stretch a bit when catching a bullet, this does a few things, but importantly it slows the bullet before stopping it.

      So this new material will likely show extreme tensile strength rather than hardness.

  • Beej Jorgensen
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 months ago

    Goes on to form company called General Products, builds spacecraft hulls. 😉

    • @Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      Good news, it’s completely non toxic.

      Bad news, it costs 2 million dollars per square foot.

      The pentagon will now take your whole paycheck.

      Thank you for your support, patriot.

      • HEXN3T
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        Good news, it costs 2 million dollars per square foot, so they won’t militarise the police further with it.

        • @Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 months ago

          There is an old Russian joke.
          Son asks his father, “Daddy, I’ve heard the price of vodka went up, does it mean you will be drinking less?”, and the father answers “No, son, you will be eating less”.

        • @IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 months ago

          Well not immediately… Years from now when the military develops something even better then this will all become surplus and sold off to SWAT teams etc. for next to nothing.

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      With these bonds so dense, I want to imagine that it would actually be quite non-toxic as these is little to react with.

      Then again, I’m not a bio chemist

  • Soulifix
    link
    fedilink
    03 months ago

    I’ll be eager to know what the results will be about it’s resistance to bullets and sharpened objects.

    • @sm1dger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      Currently, garbage. They used it to reinforce a polymer to go from a strength of 50 MPa to 70 MPa. Kevlar is 10x stronger, commercially scaled, and cheap