Hot off the back of its recent leadership rejig, Mozilla has announced users of Firefox will soon be subject to a ‘Terms of Use’ policy — a first for the iconic open source web browser.

This official Terms of Use will, Mozilla argues, offer users ‘more transparency’ over their ‘rights and permissions’ as they use Firefox to browse the information superhighway — as well well as Mozilla’s “rights” to help them do it, as this excerpt makes clear:

You give Mozilla all rights necessary to operate Firefox, including processing data as we describe in the Firefox Privacy Notice, as well as acting on your behalf to help you navigate the internet.

When you upload or input information through Firefox, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license to use that information to help you navigate, experience, and interact with online content as you indicate with your use of Firefox.

Also about to go into effect is an updated privacy notice (aka privacy policy). This adds a crop of cushy caveats to cover the company’s planned AI chatbot integrations, cloud-based service features, and more ads and sponsored content on Firefox New Tab page.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 months ago

    Wtf is happening, why is now even Firefox going off the rails?

    • @Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      probably saw all the money by having thier browsers info being sold off to companies, like with chrome, and google and reddit/OPEN AI collusion.

      • smeg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 months ago

        The writing was on the wall when the Mozilla Corporation was setup under the Foundation. A bunch of SF venture capital types have places on the board, and are in operational leadership, and are slowly transforming Mozilla into a shitty for-profit tech venture. Ads, data collection, subscription services, and a chat bot.

    • @shortrounddev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 months ago

      Waterfox’s creator, while not being HOSTILE to privacy, has said in the past that making the most private browser in the world is not the goal of the project. The goal is a more customizable browser for power users

  • ☂️-
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 months ago

    can a chromium fork reasonably be maintained with adblock support?

  • @Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    sometimes bound to give, if firefox isnt taking in money from having no ads, to having ads. they are going to need tons of ads, and the ability to sell your browser info for money, much like chrome is doing. surprised its taken this long to finally say “private donations isnt enough”

  • @cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 months ago

    Get ready for ads as well

    https://github.com/mozilla/bedrock/commit/d459addab846d8144b61939b7f4310eb80c5470e#commitcomment-153095625

    They removed this:

    
                {
    
                    "@type": "Question",
    
                    "name": "Does Firefox sell your personal data?",
    
                    "acceptedAnswer": {
    
                        "@type": "Answer",
    
                        "text": "Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from many of the advertisers who do. Firefox products are designed to protect your privacy. That’s a promise. "
    
                    }
    
                },
    
    
    • @douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 months ago

      Turns out when you gotta choose between going defunct and selling ad space, selling ad space wins.

      Also turns out that drying up donations for privacy protecting browsers means there is less demand for it, and less money to fund it.

      The majority cost of Firefox is engineering salaries.

      Eventually something has to give, and this is it.

      • @WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 months ago

        Also turns out that drying up donations for privacy protecting browsers means there is less demand for it

        Or, hear me out, that former donors don’t trust them anymore!

        But also that a lot of people don’t want to donate, basically when they could only donate an immeasurably small amount, to a company whose CEO gets an unimaginably huge pay, that could be used for significantly boosting development.
        Personally that’s a big reason I rather want to support smaller projects, or even that of size like Bitwarden.

      • katy ✨
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 months ago

        they’re firefox forks and ubo comes automatically installed with them.

    • @And009@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 months ago

      I have librewolf, don’t use it much. Is it functionally the same as FF? In terms of plug-in and website compatibility.

      Most consumer sites are optimized for chrome and even safari, firefox & Edge (Obviously) face issues with scripts and plug-ins.

      • @dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 months ago

        Most consumer sites are optimized for chrome and even safari, firefox & Edge (Obviously) face issues with scripts and plug-ins.

        This is why it’s dangerous that Chrome has such a large amount of market share. Instead of using standard features, sites are using Chrome-specific features and even relying on Chrome bugs that don’t exist in other browsers. It’s exactly the same reason Internet Explorer was bad.

      • @cley_faye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 months ago

        It’s basically the same, but the devil is in the detail. DRM disabled from the get go, which is a show stopper for some sites (say, netflix). Some sites will bork themselve on the strange user-agent. Some advanced privacy features are quite hard to disable willingly, which may or may not be a good thing if you actually have to get things done on sites that breaks.

        One would argue that sites that breaks when privacy features are enforced are not worth it, but you don’t always have a choice in that regard.

    • DFX4509B
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 months ago

      LibreWolf, or if you can tolerate some breakage, PaleMoon or Basilisk (I say ‘if you can tolerate some breakage’ because Goanna is hard-forked from old ESR code, and PaleMoon and Basilisk are both Goanna-based).

    • @garretble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 months ago

      As I understand it, these changes don’t affect browsers that use FF as a base, so Zen Browser might not be affected.

      I’ve been trying it out this week, and it’s good. And can still use all the FF extensions.

      https://zen-browser.app/

    • masterofn001
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 months ago

      To add to the list:

      Mullvad browser (pc only) (removes blobs,proprietary crap, telemetry, and is otherwise hardened and was developed in partnership with the tor org. Some prefs are fine to change but you’re best off by leaving as is.

      Tor browser - nuff said. If you want anonymity use this. Don’t change any prefs.

      Arkenfox has a nodded user.is file you can simply drop into your current ff profile dir. It includes many hidden prefs and settings and allows you to customize for your needs/threat model.

      Arkenfox’s mods are used by other privacy friendly browsers. As are some tor mods.

      If you can find your way around about:config and don’t mind some learning, you can achieve most of the results of hardened broswers.

      There are guides to further harden your ff. Search for Hardened Firefox.

  • @Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Where’s the gofundme for the firefox fork project?

    Was this from google turning off the funding tap?

  • DFX4509B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 months ago

    Good thing LibreWolf and other forks exist, including hard forks like the Goanna browsers.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 months ago

    So now what the hell do we have to use to not be spied upon?

    • @tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 months ago

      In the good/bad old days a web page was just text and images but now a browser is a platform for running software. Each website can do useful computing for the user but the software author is in control and always tempted to make it run for them at the expenve of the user.

      Crazy idea, maybe we shouldn’t use web browsers.

    • @DominicJ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 months ago

      Soon other web engine will coming, first LadyBird browser and two is Servo Browser. But they’re still along way to go

      • @mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 months ago

        I am still waiting desperately for a servo based browser, mozilla kicking it out was one of the reasons I lost all hope in Mozilla a while back.

      • @adub@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 months ago

        Am I missing something on Servo Browser? Because when I went to check it out and seems more like next-gen browser engine that looks to be an improvement on Firefox’s Gecko. If so then we will need to wait for a browser team to adopt it.

    • @Bogasse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Well I suppose LibreWolf (or some other de-branded Firefox) will become more mainstream. Similar to what chromium is to chrome 🤷

      • Kilgore Trout
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 months ago

        That’s not a real equivalence.

        Chromium is the basis for Google Chrome, while Librewolf is nothing more than a leech to Firefox. It’s just Firefox, rebranded.

        • @cley_faye@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 months ago

          Rebranded, pre-cleaned of all the forced stuff from mozilla, with the built-in integration of more privacy-enhancing features.

          So, not “just firefox, rebranded” at all.

          • @scholar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 months ago

            They aren’t developing or maintaining the core browser though, they depend on Firefox still being looked after.

    • Lanske
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 months ago

      Librewolf is still a good alternative