• Jesus
      link
      fedilink
      1513 days ago

      Definitely if you’re on a .ml address.

    • @qprimed@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1013 days ago

      randomized MACs on public WiFi, burner email addresses and Tor are the new fortress phones.

      “fortress phone”. I’m old. :(

      • @Railcar8095@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        212 days ago

        Can’t Tor usage be identified? The encryption pattern, connection to known entry points…?

        My thread model doesn’t need For, but I’m not sure if it’s enough against being singled out by a state actor.

        I’m even wondering if to attempt privacy isn’t going to be an issue if things get worse.

        • @jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          No, it can’t. Dont spread misinformation. Tor is extremely secure, when used properly. TAILS helps.

          Edit: they can see that you’re using tor. They can’t see your traffic or who you’re communicating with.

          • @Railcar8095@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            512 days ago

            No, it can’t. Dont spread misinformation. Tor is extremely secure, when used properly. TAILS helps.

            I haven’t said anything about it’s security, so I’m not “spreading misinformation”

            Edit: they can see that you’re using tor. They can’t see your traffic or who you’re communicating with.

            Glad you went back and added an edit to agree with what I said. I would have removed the unnecessary abrasive first paragraph too, but it’s a step in the right direction.

  • @Zachariah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    3513 days ago

    More than 1 million Californians and Texans are about to face a new level of financial surveillance from the federal government. Although cash transactions over $10,000 have long been reported under current law, now many transactions of as little as $200 will have to be reported in 30 ZIP Codes along the border with Mexico. Financial surveillance in the United States has needed reform, but this policy marks little more than another intrusion into the lives of Americans.

  • @BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    3213 days ago

    THIS is the Small Government I want! Government SO SMALL that you have to Tell Them EVERY PENNY you Spend!

  • GhostalmediaOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2913 days ago

    And in addition to friend and family getting on watchlists, this also means that a LOT of businesses are going to start keeping a lot of cash around if they want to keep prices down.

    • @qprimed@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3613 days ago

      gotta disagree. with current electronic processing, storage and forthcoming AI analysis, that axiom no longer applies - everyone is on a watch list.

    • I don’t think that phrase really works universally. The original line from the Incredibles makes sense because “super” is a relative term. If we’re all on a watchlist that doesn’t mean we’re not actually being watched or not in danger, it just means we stopped distinguishing levels of suspicion or “saving resources” for the most dangerous people. Think they don’t have the resources to watch everyone? That’s what AI is for.

    • Em Adespoton
      link
      fedilink
      1413 days ago

      Unfortunately, that’s not true.

      Also unfortunately, a LOT of people are treated as if they’re on a watchlist, even when they aren’t.

      If everyone is on a watchlist, that means everyone is being watched so they can be punished if they do anything that could even be remotely considered outside the law.

      Pulled over for speeding and you’re on a watchlist? Off to interrogation for you.

      • @orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1113 days ago

        The point is that’s not a watchlist, that’s just a panopticon authoritarian state. Big Brother is always watching.