@Wilshire@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years agoScarlett Johansson denied OpenAI the right to use her voice. They used it anyway.boingboing.netexternal-linkmessage-square178fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkScarlett Johansson denied OpenAI the right to use her voice. They used it anyway.boingboing.net@Wilshire@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square178fedilink
minus-square@Suavevillain@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish0•2 years agoMost of AI just seems to blatant theft and copyright issues.
minus-square@Blackmist@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglish0•2 years agoNo, it’s only theft when it’s poor people doing it. When it’s rich people, it’s fair use of a publicly available resource.
minus-squareoce 🐆linkfedilinkEnglish0•2 years agoAnd traumatizing developing countries labor with what the internet has of most terrible.
minus-square@kibiz0r@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish0•2 years agoThat’s pretty much the whole point. Making use of other people’s work and likeness in a way that removes any obligations you would normally have to those people. Just clearly define “copyright violation” for us, and we’ll craft a method that technically eludes your definition.
Most of AI just seems to blatant theft and copyright issues.
Not in this case.
No, it’s only theft when it’s poor people doing it.
When it’s rich people, it’s fair use of a publicly available resource.
And traumatizing developing countries labor with what the internet has of most terrible.
That’s pretty much the whole point.
Making use of other people’s work and likeness in a way that removes any obligations you would normally have to those people.
Just clearly define “copyright violation” for us, and we’ll craft a method that technically eludes your definition.