Let them eat each other.

    • @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      652 months ago

      Careful, you might get sued for not advertising on X. I’m presently planning to buy ads confirming that I have nothing to sell. You know, for “protection.”

      Shut up, it’s sarcasm, leave me alone.

      • @JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        152 months ago

        Good thing you said sarcasm. Otherwise I’d have to take out an x campaign, in all caps, using your sorry post as an example of a conservative oligarch supporting troll.

        • @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          132 months ago

          I hate that the world has become so stupid that I have to say it. Used to be a person could say something absurd and it was obvious that they were joking.

    • @tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 months ago

      I commented on it below. There are no specifics in the article, but from the phrasing “collective action among competing”, my guess is that this is probably an antitrust claim. That is, there’s no obligation to buy service from a given company, but there may be an obligation for competitors to not collude in making buy/not-buy decisions from a supplier.

    • @rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      72 months ago

      I think the crux of it is they are claiming collusion, in an anti-trust way. But I haven’t heard the lawyers claim that once. Not once.