• NSRXN
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -4
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    plagiarism is neither a civil tort nor a criminal offense.

    • @inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      Back when I worked as a designer, using work without paying for usage rights leads to exposure of being civilly sued for copyright violations.

      You’re wrong. Confidently wrong.

      • NSRXN
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -13 months ago

        if you were sued civilly for copyright violations, that’s not plagiarism. That’s copyright infringement. plagiarism is something else.

          • NSRXN
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            if I plagiarize The Bible, that has nothing to do with copyright. it’s still plagiarism.

            • @inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              The Bible is well past the copyright period which IIRC is 70 years in America. The Bible is free use at this point. No different than the original Mickey Mouse which is also out of copyright protection. Or the Mona Lisa.

              The fact that you reference the Bible of all books shows how unbelievably confidently incorrect you are. Are you chatgpt?

              • NSRXN
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -13 months ago

                you don’t seem to know what plagiarism is, so I don’t see the point in continuing this conversation.

          • NSRXN
            link
            fedilink
            English
            03 months ago

            no it’s not. it’s an academic crime.