• Jeffool
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 months ago

    When it was new to me I tried ChatGPT out of curiosity, like with why tech, and I just kept getting really annoyed at the expansive bullshit it gave to the simplest of input. “Give me a list of 3 X” lead to fluff-filled paragraphs for each. The bastard children of a bad encyclopedia and the annoying kid in school.

    I realized I was understanding it wrong, and it was supposed to be understood not as a useful tool, but as close to interacting with a human, pointless prose and all. That just made me more annoyed. It still blows my mind people say they use it when writing.

    • @SPOOSER@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 months ago

      How else can the “elite” seperate themselces from the common folk? The elite loves writing 90% fluff and require high word counts in academia instead of actually making consise, clear, articulate articles that are easy to understand. You have to have a certain word count to qualify for “good writing” in any elite group. Look at Law, Political Science, History, Scientific Journals, etc. I had professor who would tell me they could easily find the information in the articles they needed and that one day we would be able to as well. That’s why ChatGPT spits out a shit ton of fluff.

        • @Womble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          They in fact often have word and page limits and most journal articles I’ve been a part of have had a period at the end of cutting and trimming in order to fit into those limits.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 months ago

            That makes sense considering a journal can only be so many pages long.