Karna to Linux@lemmy.ml • 1 year agoGNOME Software May Eventually Drop RPM Support In Favor Of Flatpakswww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up1143arrow-down17
arrow-up1136arrow-down1external-linkGNOME Software May Eventually Drop RPM Support In Favor Of Flatpakswww.phoronix.comKarna to Linux@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square32fedilink
minus-square@corsicanguppy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agoThen gnome will cease to be an option. Fucking flatpaks.
minus-square@chronicledmonocle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•1 year agoWhile I prefer Debian packages, what’s wrong with Flatpaks other than a bit of bloat caused by redundant dependencies? They’re not Snaps.
minus-square@zipping2583@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•1 year agoThey acutally use deduplication. So if there is a package needed in e.g. 10 different flatpaks it will not take 10x the space on the drive.
minus-square@chronicledmonocle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•1 year agoReally? Nice. Didn’t know that about Flatpaks.
minus-square@zipping2583@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•1 year agoIt was mentioned in a podcast from the linux cast - there was actually a guy (I believe he works for gnome) and he cleaned up with some prejudices about flatpaks. One of them being that they consume too much space on disk ;)
Then gnome will cease to be an option.
Fucking flatpaks.
While I prefer Debian packages, what’s wrong with Flatpaks other than a bit of bloat caused by redundant dependencies? They’re not Snaps.
They acutally use deduplication. So if there is a package needed in e.g. 10 different flatpaks it will not take 10x the space on the drive.
Really? Nice. Didn’t know that about Flatpaks.
It was mentioned in a podcast from the linux cast - there was actually a guy (I believe he works for gnome) and he cleaned up with some prejudices about flatpaks. One of them being that they consume too much space on disk ;)