@return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world • 2 months agoShots fired into insurance CEO’s Oregon homewww.oregonlive.comexternal-linkmessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1569arrow-down14cross-posted to: usa@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1565arrow-down1external-linkShots fired into insurance CEO’s Oregon homewww.oregonlive.com@return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world • 2 months agomessage-square67fedilinkcross-posted to: usa@lemmy.ml
minus-squaresnooggumslinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoThey certainly do need to foot the bill for unsafe workplaces, but that does not need to be tied directly to injuries. They should be paying for the unsafe workplace even if no one is injured, and even more if someone is injured.
minus-square@spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-22 months ago They should be paying for the unsafe workplace even if no one is injured, and even more if someone is injured. You just described the purpose of both OSHA and workman’s comp.
minus-squaresnooggumslinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-22 months agoYes, I know. I am saying they should be one thing instead of two things.
They certainly do need to foot the bill for unsafe workplaces, but that does not need to be tied directly to injuries. They should be paying for the unsafe workplace even if no one is injured, and even more if someone is injured.
You just described the purpose of both OSHA and workman’s comp.
Yes, I know. I am saying they should be one thing instead of two things.