• @sorter_plainview@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    17 months ago

    Hey sorry for the confusion. What I meant is Proxmos is considered as a bare metal hypervisor and Virt manager is a hypervisor inside an OS, right?

    • Technically no, both use kvm virtualization which is included in the Linux kernal, so both are “bare metal hypervisors” other wise know as class 1 hypervisors. Distinctions can be confusing 😂

    • Possibly linuxOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      *Proxmox

      Virtual manager is a application that connects to libvirtd in the back end. Think of it as a web browser or file manager for VMs.

      Proxmox VE is an entire OS built for virtualization on dedicated servers. It also has support for clusters and live VM migrations between hosts. It is in essence a server OS designed to run in a data center (or homelab) of some kind. If is sort of equivalent to vSphere but they charge you per CPU socket for enterprise support and stability

      • @sorter_plainview@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        07 months ago

        Well this thread clearly established that I neither have technical knowledge and I don’t pay attention to spelling…

        Jokes aside this is a good explanation. I have seen admins using vSphere and it kind of makes sense. I’m just starting to scratch the surface of homelab, and now started out with a raspberry pie. My dream is a full fledged self sustaining homelab.

        • Possibly linuxOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          07 months ago

          If you ever want to get a Proxmox cluster go for 3-5 identical machines. I have a 3 totally different machines and it creates headaches

          • @DrWeevilJammer@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            07 months ago

            What kind of headaches are you having? I’ve been running two completely different machines in a cluster with a pi as a Qdevice to keep quorum and it’s been incredibly stable for years.

            • Possibly linuxOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              One device decided to be finicky and the biggest storage array is all on one system.

              It really sucks you can’t do HA with BTRFS. It is more reliable than ZFS due to licensing

                • Possibly linuxOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  17 months ago

                  OpenZFS is not GPL compatible so it can never be baked into the kernel in the same way BTRFS can. I’ve run into issues where I’ve needed to downgrade the kernel but if I do the system won’t boot.

                  Btrfs also doesn’t need any special software to work as it is completely native and baked in.