Brought to you by the Department of Erasing History.

    • @UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 month ago

      Burden of proof baby… U accuse someone of something, it’s ur job to prove it (or at least come up with a hypothesis). Just commenting ur conclusion n running away giggling is not the nicest thing to do.

      • Melkath
        link
        fedilink
        01 month ago

        The irony of claiming burden of proof on a post about proof being suppressed.

        My hunch is the billions of dollars we have recently siphoned into a cyber warfare branch of the military, Project 2025, which is advancing almost identically to how The Plan for the New American Century progressed 20 years ago, and a President who is in bed with a war criminal fugitive. Oh, and they also recently started one of the largest censorship campaigns in decades Ala “STOP FREELY SHARING INFORMATION ON TIK TOK! WE ARE SUPPOSED TO FILTER RAW INFORMATION OUT AND PROPAGANDA IN VIA MAJOR NEWS NETWORKS AND ISP THROTTLES THAT WE CONTROL!!@!@”

        The 100% part was hyperbole, but America is the one doing everything in it’s power to spark WWIII, and the one that benefits most from scrubbing recent history.

        • @UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 month ago

          Ok, we at least have a hypothesis now. So u’r saying, the US military is secretly executing a Republican plan when a Democrat is in office, when there was a Republican President in office just 3 years ago who tried to coup the government? Don’t u think the military would’ve pulled shit waaaay more noticeable than DDOSing a goddamn archive for five minutes?

          Also, why would America want to spark WW3? Businesses function best during peacetime. WW3 would definitely mean usage of nuclear weapons. By your logic, we should’ve already had a nuclear war back when the Soviet Union existed.

          This is just like the anti vax conspiracies- the US military is putting chips through vaccinations to control u.

      • @Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        I’m sure there’s proof just laying around, what is the article about ? Oh nevermind if someone didn’t write about it online it’s not true. The US has no history of this type of nonsense.

        • @UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 month ago

          Again, burden of proof. Ur comment is similar to anti vaxxers saying- “Bill Gates is putting microchips through vaccinations to control society. What, why’re you asking me for proof? Look it up! It’s right there on the internet! Plus billionaires are known to pull shit like this.”

          • @Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 month ago

            One is plausible. One is not. What did you do with all the time you saved typing ur instead of your you fuckin dunce

            • @UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 month ago

              One is plausible. One is not.

              Again, mentioning the conclusion without the goddamn hypothesis and evidence to support the hypothesis.

              What did you do with all the time you saved typing ur instead of your you fuckin dunce

              I boinked ur mom (sorry, u kinda invited me for that lol)

              • @Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Anyone with a science background understands fiction from reality. Really anyone who learned basic science or biology in high school.

                If you don’t understand that, Im not wasting my time writing a dissertation explaining vaccines and microchips to you.

    • capital
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 month ago

      Have you ever heard the phrase, “that which is asserted without evidence maybe dismissed without evidence”?

      • applepie
        link
        fedilink
        01 month ago

        yeah but we also live in the age where difference between a conspiracy theory and an outright conspiracy can sometimes be as short as 6 months lol

        • capital
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 month ago

          Sounds like it doesn’t take long to wait for evidence then hu?

          • applepie
            link
            fedilink
            01 month ago

            about the same time when they start busting corpo leakers

            • capital
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 month ago

              Ok. In the meantime, I don’t have to believe anything that’s untrue.

              • applepie
                link
                fedilink
                01 month ago

                Did somebody tell you what to believe in this comment section?

                • capital
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  01 month ago

                  No. Review the thread.

                  This started with you being 100% sure of something you seem to have zero evidence for.