• @prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    1185 days ago

    Fucking do it already. His approval ratings are pretty low right now (billionaire approval ratings, fucking gross), so I feel like MAGA might not come to his defense this time.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Fucking do it already

      Laws are for little people. Nobody in Wisconsin is going to green light this, because nobody has the chutzpah to inconvenience a billionaire.

      I feel like MAGA might not come to his defense this time

      MAGA isn’t the problem. Corporate media and the Trump AG are the problem.

        • filtoid
          link
          fedilink
          45 days ago

          I often felt from context it was closer to “hubris”, as “cajones” might just mean brave.

          • @damdy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            95 days ago

            Hubris means ‘overvalued confidence’ I believe. Whereas cajones etc is just stubborn confidence. Similar, but importantly different.

            • filtoid
              link
              fedilink
              15 days ago

              Would you mind explaining how chutzpah and hubris differ please? I’m not sure I get it.

              • @monotremata@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                85 days ago

                Hubris is a kind of boastful pride–like a sense of invulnerability. It also implies a kind of dramatic irony, that this sense of invulnerability will eventually prove false. (The term comes from ancient Greek theater, where it’s often the Heroic Flaw that will eventually be the undoing of the tragic hero.)

                Chutzpah is more…audacity, nerve, gall. A person with chutzpah doesn’t believe they can’t be harmed; they’re just willing to bald-face it out in the hopes you won’t actually call them on it. In English it can have a positive connotation, the way “cojones” tends to, but it can also have a negative connotation, like “cheek” or “gall.” It comes from Yiddish, where apparently it’s more uniformly negative. (Leave it to us Americans to interpret a condemnation of shameless effrontery as somehow laudatory.)

                I guess I would say the key difference is that someone with hubris thinks they are invulnerable, whereas a person with chutzpah is aware they are vulnerable and absolutely refusing to act like it.

                They’re definitely kind of related, but they just have really different feels to them

                • filtoid
                  link
                  fedilink
                  14 days ago

                  Thank you that’s good to know. I wasn’t aware of any positive affiliation with it. I’ll bear it in mind moving forward :)

                • filtoid
                  link
                  fedilink
                  14 days ago

                  Ah that’s interesting, I had thought of it more negatively. It’s not a common word where I am, so my knowledge has been gleaned from American media, mostly.

    • @argarath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      74 days ago

      They’ll defend him because if he goes to prison that is now a can of worms they cannot close, the slippery slope they fear the most is society actually putting these people in prison