• @dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1317 months ago

      Of course not, the two cases are totally different. They’re so different, it’s like black and white…

    • @CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      34
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Well, trump wouldn’t be elected into position - that is explicitly prohibited. So no running for him or Obama.

      The “loophole” is that he’s trying to line up a coordinated effort to elect other GOP members. After elected they’ll nominate trump into the line of succession as Secretary of State or another unelected position. Once the pawns are in place, the line of succession simply has to step down until it falls to him. Third term without breaking the “elected twice to office” condition.

      • @takeda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        227 months ago

        IMO this is just to test the base and get them used to him stay in the office until he dies then someone from his family takes over or maybe musk himself.

        The goal is a dictatorship and if there will be an election it will be a sham one line putin has.

        • @CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          137 months ago

          I agree it would be a temporary measure. Realistically Republicans only need ~6 more governors on board before they can start talking constitutional amendments, and do away with these pesky restrictions all together.

                • @hedgehog@ttrpg.network
                  link
                  fedilink
                  17 months ago

                  Not directly, but indirectly. You gerrymander the district-based positions, which allow you to pass legislation enabling you to suppress enough votes to win the statewide elections, too.

        • @CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I realize I’m playing advocate for a devil that needs no help, and I hope you’re right. Simply saying there are arguments taking place that seperate the requirements of “being elected” as defined in the 22nd vs “being eligible” as defined by article 2.

          As it’s been explained to me, this interpretation would of course be challenged, and ultimately determined by our wonderful supreme court.

        • @barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          He just won’t leave, like Maduro in Venezuela. Who’s going to kick him out? Nobody kicked Maduro out, and HitlerPig’s betting that nobody will kick him out either.

          If he tries it, there should be a death sentence on everyone in his administration. It might be hard to hit him, but when his staff and cabinet start dying in the streets while picking their dry cleaning or exiting a restaurant, they’ll all leave town toot sweet.

    • @pleasegoaway@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      77 months ago

      No, the bill presented by GOP congress excludes any president that served two consecutive terms.

      So currently, the only person on the planet that can serve a third term is trump.