• NSRXN
    link
    fedilink
    -511 months ago

    most of what animals are fed are parts of plants people can’t or won’t eat, or grazed grass. in that way, we are conserving resources.

      • NSRXN
        link
        fedilink
        -311 months ago

        the vast bulk of the food they eat is grown agriculturally.

        sure, but I can’t eat cornstalks and I don’t want to eat soy cake, so feeding that to livestock is a conservation of resources.

          • NSRXN
            link
            fedilink
            011 months ago

            Human food crops could have been grown instead, on a fraction of the land.

            human food crops are grown. soy is a great example. about 80% of soy is pressed for oil, and the byproduct is fed to livestock.

          • NSRXN
            link
            fedilink
            011 months ago

            The majority of all the plants that humans grow are fed to livestock.

            this is a lie

      • NSRXN
        link
        fedilink
        -211 months ago

        no, you said those calories are wasted.

        • @ByGourou@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Read more than the first sentence please

          “Some of those are useless calories, we can’t eat grass and on some lands where only grass grows so cows are a way of using that grass, but that’s not the majority.”

          • NSRXN
            link
            fedilink
            011 months ago

            most people don’t want to eat soy cake, or crop seconds, or spoilage. feeding that to livestock is a conservation of resources, not a waste.

              • NSRXN
                link
                fedilink
                -111 months ago

                it does not address the moral argument that is at the root of this discussion.

                the moral argument in this thread is about allocation of resources. if you want to make a separate moral argument, you’re free to do so.