• @nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    56
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I find the threat of GPS loss to be hard to believe. Theyd have to take out 38 GPS satelites and presumably any of the other navagation satellites American allies have in orbit, and presumably theyd have to not damage their own navigation satelites in the process. I also doubt they could do that all at the same time, or quick enough that no one could respond. Im sure they have the capability, and im sure they have an idea of what the operation would have to look like but in terms of a plan that’s actionable, I have big doubts.

    • @linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      I wouldn’t be so quick to dismiss that threat.

      They know exactly where in the sky they are. They know what frequencies their antennas are tuned to. I’m betting burning out those transceivers would not be an impossible feat.

      I also don’t know how well they put up against really large lasers

      They’ve also been fully capable of putting s*** into space for years. I would not put it past them to have some form of combination weather/spy satellite and weapons platform out there.

      • @Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        122 years ago

        They must be aware of the concept of re-ta-lia-tion. You shoot down my satellites, I shoot down yours. Nobody wins and we are all back 40 years.

      • @nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        38
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Where though? They just gonna fly enough jammers up into orbit to cover the entire path and all the satelites and pretend thats not going to also jam every navagation satelite including their own and China, their biggest allys? I don’t see it.

          • Skua
            link
            fedilink
            202 years ago

            The Soviet Union proved that it was able to shoot down satellites in the 60s. The technical difficulty of hitting a satellite with a missile is not really an obstacle here

            • @SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              142 years ago

              Yeah, the Soviet union could also mass produce tanks and planes. Russia today…

              Glances at Ukraine

              Is using almost exclusively Soviet stock.

            • @Buffalox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              92 years ago

              It may not be a problem technology wise, but do they really have the equipment today to blow up dozens of satellites?
              I seriously doubt it, Russia isn’t the Soviet Union, they seem less capable, and corruption would probably have undermined the program even if it still existed.
              And even if they can, can they also do it without harming their own and China’s geopositioning systems?

              • @Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                52 years ago

                And even if they can, can they also do it without harming their own and China’s geopositioning systems?

                Nope, they can’t. And not only that, destroying that many satellites is almost assuredly going to trigger Kessler Syndrome and lock out space for the most part for a good long while.

          • borari
            link
            fedilink
            92 years ago

            Just put up your own satellites that mimic the GPS satellites to throw off the calculations of anyone trying to use them. Your devices wouldn’t know which signals were legit.

            Do this, then get absolutely raw dog fucked by the US (and any other competent) military, who has absolutely no issue with ground nav or weapons guidance because they all use encrypted GPS signals.

          • @nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            You don’t need satellites in space to shift GPS, they’ve been messing with it in war zones for years, and AWACS like planes could do it in real time anywhere they won’t get shot down.

          • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            China doing it in 2007 was big news because they joined the club. The West and Russia has had the capability for decades.

        • @snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -62 years ago

          Jam some strategic locations, like air travel hubs or highly populated areas for the highest impact. No need to jam wide open low population areas without military targets.

          • Mayor Poopington
            link
            fedilink
            English
            212 years ago

            Real curious how Russia plans to get jamming equipment the size of a truck into those areas

            • @nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              14
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              I also just don’t see anyone in Russia deciding that were going to trigger article 5 by using a jammer on US soil. The risk reward is non existent unless they can make the whole country GPS and internet dark at the same time. Imagine that many resources going on the ground in a country as large as America. It’s basically asking Ukraine to regain any territory they had a counter invasion plan ready for.

            • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              32 years ago

              That’s easy you just drive the truck into the area. It’s when you turn it on that’s the issue. You’re going to meet a lot of people very fast.

                  • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    02 years ago

                    Huh. I went to go look at that stuff and it’s definitely 2024. At any rate news articles made it clear that airports have dealt with GPS jamming for over a decade already and the FCC is pretty quick to send someone out with RDF equipment if it’s not a transient signal from a highway. Planes aren’t falling out of the sky so they’ve got a good idea of how to handle it already.

            • @snooggums@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              I was just pointing out that it isn’t necessary to jam 100% of GPS to have a massive impact. The odds that Russia could pull anything off is pretty small, and jamming GPS for more than a few hours is evenless likely.

          • Triggering NATO collective defense so they can deploy a jammer on US soil doesn’t seem to be what they’re threatening, and they’re already been using jammers in Ukraine. So either theyre threatening to do something they can’t do or theyre threatening to do something they’re already doing, and already being countered, in a new place.

      • Which they do. Not on a global scale, though.

        It is quite annoying to be Russia’s neighbours. But you can work around it. In fact, it’s not bad to train yourself to operate without GNSS. And it would be even better if the jammers decided to spontaneously combust.