A 2025 Tesla Model 3 in Full-Self Driving mode drives off of a rural road, clips a tree, loses a tire, flips over, and comes to rest on its roof. Luckily, the driver is alive and well, able to post about it on social media.

I just don’t see how this technology could possibly be ready to power an autonomous taxi service by the end of next week.

    • @innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 months ago

      I’m gonna answer your question with a question, as I don’t have your answer. When a human wrecks up it’s their fault. Who’s fault is it when something like this happens? Should ut still be the person in the driver’s seat?

    • @ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 months ago

      A good point, but I’m not sure that’s where the bar is. How does it compare to other self-driving systems that have lidar, for instance?

    • KayLeadfootOP
      link
      fedilink
      011 months ago

      Ditto! They were about 1 foot from hitting the tree head on rather than glancing off, could have easily been fatal. Weirdly small axises of random chance that the world spins on

        • KayLeadfootOP
          link
          fedilink
          011 months ago

          It makes no damn sense! There were worse shadows. it was totally unpredictable

        • @Phen@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          011 months ago

          There’s some difference in the fences on the left side at the exact time the car passed by on the other lane. My guess is that the timing of the other car made the software interpret those changes in the input as something moving instead of simply something being different.

        • @IllNess@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          011 months ago

          I thought it might be following the tire tracks but no. It just decided to veer completely off.

    • @kambusha@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 months ago

      Except for the last 0.05 seconds before the crash where the human was put in control. Therefore, the human caused the crash.

    • @madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      Self driving via cameras IS NOT THE FUTURE!! Cameras are basically slightly better human eyes and human eyes suck ass.

    • KayLeadfootOP
      link
      fedilink
      011 months ago

      You’re probably right about the future, but like damn, I wish they would slow their roll and use LiDAR

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        011 months ago

        Elon Musk decided they absolutely would not use lidar, years ago when lidar was expensive enough that a decision like that made economic sense to at least try making work. Nowadays lidar is a lot cheaper but for whatever reason Musk has drawn a line in the sand and refuses to back down on it.

        Unlike many people online these days I don’t believe that Musk is some kind of sheer-luck bought-his-way-into-success grifter, he has been genuinely involved in many of the decisions that made his companies grow. But this is one of the downsides of that (Cybertruck is another). He’s forced through ideas that turned out to be amazing, but he’s also forced through ideas that sucked. He seems to be increasingly having trouble distinguishing them.

        • @Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Musk has drawn a line in the sand and refuses to back down on it.

          From what I heard the upcoming Tesla robotaxi test cars based on model Y are supposed to have LIDAR. But it’s ONLY the robotaxi version that has it.

          He seems to be increasingly having trouble distinguishing them.

          Absolutely, seems to me he has been delusional for years, and it’s getting worse.

        • @LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          011 months ago

          He really hasn’t. He purchased companies that were already sitting on profitable ideas. He is not an engineer. He is not a scientist. He has no training in any design discipline. He takes credit for the ideas of people he pays. He takes credit for the previous achievements of companies he’s purchased.

          What is it going to fucking take for people to finally actually see the grifter for what he is? He’s never had a single good fucking r&d idea in his life 🙃 he has wasted billions of dollars researching and developing absolutely useless ideas that have benefited literally no one and have not made him any money. It is absolutely incredible how powerful his mythos is, that people still believe him to be or have been some kind of engineer or something. He’s a fucking racist nepo baby. He’s never done a single useful thing in his life. He wasn’t the sole individual involved in creating PayPal (and was entirely unrelated in turning it into the successful business it became), he didnt found tesla nor is he responsible for any of the technological developments it made (except for forcing his shitty charger design that notoriously breaks down and charges at half the speed that competitors do), he did not found SpaceX and by all metrics involved has been loathed by everyone at the company for the past decade for continuously committing workers rights violations and fostering a racist sexist and ableist work environment. The man has done nothing but waste people’s time stoking his ego and sexually abusing a slew of employees for the past 2 and a half decades.

  • RandomStickman
    link
    fedilink
    011 months ago

    Anything outside of a freshly painted and paved LA roads at high noon while it’s sunny isn’t ready for self drivings it seems

      • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 months ago

        I’m not sure about even the more advanced self-driving cars. Shit gets fucked with snow and all kinds of other stuff.

        Flummoxes many human drivers too tbh.

        • @SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          011 months ago

          I’m confident that they all still need lots of work for advanced weather, but you’re not seeing a Waymo or a Zoox drive into a tree for no reason.

  • @orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    English
    011 months ago

    The worst part is that this problem has already been solved by using LIDAR. Vegas had fully self-driving cars that I saw perform flawlessly, because they were manufactured by a company that doesn’t skimp on tech and rip people off.

    • @NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I wouldn’t really called it a solved problem when waymo with lidar is crashing into physical objects

      https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/waymo-recalls-1200-robotaxis-after-cars-crash-into-chains-gates-and-utility-poles/ar-AA1EMVTF

      NHTSA stated that the crashes “involved collisions with clearly visible objects that a competent driver would be expected to avoid.” The agency is continuing its investigation.

      It’d probably be better to say that Lidar is the path to solving these problems, or a tool that can help solve it. But not solved.

      Just because you see a car working perfectly, doesn’t mean it always is working perfectly.

      • @ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        The same is true when you put a cone in front of a human driver’s vision. I don’t understand why “haha I blocked the vision of a driver and they stopped driving” is a gotcha.

      • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        A human also (hopefully anyway) wouldn’t drive if you put a cone over their head.

        Like yeah, if you purposely block the car’s vision, it should refuse to drive.

      • KayLeadfootOP
        link
        fedilink
        011 months ago

        Probably Zoox, but conceptually similar, LiDAR backed.

        You can immobilize them by setting anything large on them. Your purse, a traffic cone, a person :)

        Probably makes sense to be a little cautious with the gas pedal when there is an anything on top the vehicle.

    • @FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      Lidar doesn’t completely solve the issue lol. Lidar can’t see line markings, speed signs, pedestrian crossings, etc. Cars equipped with lidar crash into things too.

      • @orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        I oversold it in my original comment, but it still performs better than using regular cameras like Tesla did. It performs better in weather and other scenarios than standard cameras. Elon is dumb though and doesn’t think LiDAR is needed for self-driving.

  • @Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    011 months ago

    I use autopilot all the time on my boat. No way in hell I’d trust it in a car. They all occasionally get suicidal. Mine likes to lull you into a sense of false security, then take a sharp turn into a channel marker or cargo ship at the last second.

    • @dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 months ago

      Exactly. My car doesn’t have AP, but it does have a shed load of sensors and sometimes it just freaks out about stuff being too close to car for no discernible reason. Really freaks me out as I’m like what you see bro we just driving down the motorway.

      • @ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        For mine, it’s the radar seeing the retro-reflective stripes on utility poles being brighter than it expects.

    • moving to lemme.zip.
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 months ago

      They have auto pilot on boats? I never even thought about that existing. Makes sense, just never heard of it until just now!

      • JohnEdwa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 months ago

        They’ve technically had autopilots for over a century, the first one was the oil tanker J.A Moffett in 1920. Though the main purpose of it is to keep the vessel going dead straight as otherwise wind and currents turn it, so using modern car terms I think it would be more accurate to say they have lane assist? Commercial ones can often do waypoint navigation, following a set route on a map, but I don’t think that’s very common on personal vessels.

  • @otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    011 months ago

    I fear the day I’m on the receiving end of a “glitch.” It’s ridiculous that anyone can think these are safe after how many of these videos I’ve seen.

  • @LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    011 months ago

    I am never getting into a self driving car. I don’t understand why we are investing money into this technology when people can already drive cars on their own, and we should be moving towards robust public transportation systems anyway. A waste of time and resources to… what exactly? Stare at your phone for a few extra minutes a day? Work from home and every city having robust electric transit systems is what the future is supposed to be.

    • @underline960@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 months ago

      Back when I still believed, I was excited because I wanted get in my car and take a 90-minute nap until I arrived at work.

      With public transportation, you can only be half-asleep or you’ll miss your stop.

      • Beej Jorgensen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 months ago

        I used to dream of watching a movie then falling asleep in bed while my car drove the 8 hours to my folks’ house.

        But I’d want that beast to be bristling with sensors of every kind. None of this “cameras only” idiocy.

        Someday. Maybe.

      • @cestvrai@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 months ago

        I have a 45 minute high speed train commute to a busy end-of-line station. I can sleep, read, work, or just stare out the window and think.

        Same commute is probably twice as long by car during rush hour.

      • @LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 months ago

        In general I am opposed to machines being in direct control of weapons. I am also definitely of the opinion that there are lots of people who shouldn’t be driving.