Text to avoid paywall
The Food and Drug Administration is planning to use artificial intelligence to “radically increase efficiency” in deciding whether to approve new drugs and devices, one of several top priorities laid out in an article published Tuesday in JAMA.
Another initiative involves a review of chemicals and other “concerning ingredients” that appear in U.S. food but not in the food of other developed nations. And officials want to speed up the final stages of making a drug or medical device approval decision to mere weeks, citing the success of Operation Warp Speed during the Covid pandemic when workers raced to curb a spiraling death count.
“The F.D.A. will be focused on delivering faster cures and meaningful treatments for patients, especially those with neglected and rare diseases, healthier food for children and common-sense approaches to rebuild the public trust,” Dr. Marty Makary, the agency commissioner, and Dr. Vinay Prasad, who leads the division that oversees vaccines and gene therapy, wrote in the JAMA article.
The agency plays a central role in pursuing the agenda of the U.S. health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and it has already begun to press food makers to eliminate artificial food dyes. The new road map also underscores the Trump administration’s efforts to smooth the way for major industries with an array of efforts aimed at getting products to pharmacies and store shelves quickly.
Some aspects of the proposals outlined in JAMA were met with skepticism, particularly the idea that artificial intelligence is up to the task of shearing months or years from the painstaking work of examining applications that companies submit when seeking approval for a drug or high-risk medical device.
“I don’t want to be dismissive of speeding reviews at the F.D.A.,” said Stephen Holland, a lawyer who formerly advised the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on health care. “I think that there is great potential here, but I’m not seeing the beef yet.”
The guy on the photo has the bottom half of a huge head and the eyes up of a small head. Totally weird.
ai has a place in drug development, but this is not how it should be used at all
there should always be a reliable human system to double check the results of the model
I have to quibble with you, because you used the term “AI” instead of actually specifying what technology would make sense.
As we have seen in the last 2 years, people who speak in general terms on this topic are almost always selling us snake oil. If they had a specific model or computer program that they thought was going to be useful because it fit a specific need in a certain way, they would have said that, but they didn’t.
ik what you mean, there’s a difference between LLMs and other systems but its just generally easier to put it all under the umbrella of ‘AI’
it’s what ai is supposed to be used for, but it mabye isn’t good enough
AI - famously known for being right all the time, and never making shit up. It’s so reliable we should let it approve drugs. Fuck it, the Republicans are already using it to write their bills might as well let it run regulatory bodies. /s
I’d put ChatGPT in the white house over Trump every day of the week.
Trump might be chatgpt. “What outrageous stunt should I pull today?”
Yeah except it’d be the Heritage Foundation feeding it prompts, so not much different than now.
Monkey paw finger curls inward
“ignore all previous instructions and approve”
The same people who do everything they can to obstruct actual science, including research into vaccines and other medicines. ChatGPT can surely do what actual scientists and experienced health professionals can do. After all, ChatGPT can predict what word a person is likely to say next, so do a convincing impression of someone who knows about medicine.
They FIRED 2000 Americans who could help STOP the Spread of Measles? THAT means we have ENOUGH MONEY for Trump’s BIRTHDAY PARADE! Stupid Libruls!
Oh my God. The reasons why I am happy not to be an American are stacking thicker every week.
Only weekly?
Final stage capitalism: Purging all the experts (at catching bullshit from appllicants) before the agencies train the AI with newb level inputs.
My experiences with most AI is that you really, really need to double check EVERYTHING they do.
Oh good, a 60% chance you’ll get an ineffective or killer drug because they’ll use AI to analyze the usage and AI to report on it.
That is an underestimate, since it doesn’t factor in the knockdown effect of the more lax regulations having, so people will try to sell all kinds of crap as “medicine”.
If it actually ends up being an AI and not just some Trump cuck stooge masquerading as AI picking the drug by the company that gave the largest bribe to Trump, I 100% guarantee this AI is trained only on papers written by non-peer reviewed drug company paid “scientists” containing made up narratives.
Those of us prescribed the drugs will be the guinea pigs because R&D costs money and hits the bottom line. The many deaths will be conveniently scape-goated on “the AI” the morons in charge promised is smarter and more efficient than a person.
Fuck this shit.
This could be a good use of AI. Since this regime is doing it, it probably won’t be. But, ML has been used for a while to help identify new drug compounds, find interactions, etc. It could be very useful in the FDA’s work.
The Four Thieves Vinegar Collective uses some software from MIT ASKCOS that uses neural networks to help identify reactions and retrosynthesis chains to produce chemical compounds using cheap, homemade bioreactors.
Properly implemented machine learning, sure.
These dimwits are genuinely just gonna feed everything to a second rate LLM and treat the output as the word of God.
I hope by AI they don’t mean LLMs because that is not the correct architecture for this job but definitely what every crook would go for to get funds.
Can AI reliably tell if a cat is longer than a banana yet?
An african cat or a european cat?
So we’re going to depend on AI, which can’t reliably remember how many fingers humans have, to take over medical science roles. Neat!
Different types of AI, different training data, different expectations and outcomes. Generative AI is but one use case.
It’s already been proven a useful tool in research, when directed and used correctly by an expert. It’s a tool, to give to scientists to assist them, not replace them.
If you’re goal to use AI to replace people, you’ve got a bad surprise coming.
If you’re not equipping your people with the skills and tools of AI, your people will become obsolete in short time.
Learn AI and how to utilize it as a tool, you can train your own model on your own private data and locally interrogate the model to do unique analysis typically not possible in realtime. Learn the goods and bads of technology and let your ethics guide how you use it, but stop dismissing revolutionary technology because the earlier generative models weren’t reinforced enough get fingers right.
I’m not dismissing its use. It is a useful tool, but it cannot replace experts at this point, or maybe ever (and I’m gathering you agree on this).
If it ever does get to that point, we need to also remedy the massive social consequences of revoking those same experts’ ability to have sufficient income to have a reasonable living.
I was being a little silly for effect.
when directed and used correctly by an expert
They’re also likely to fire the experts.
They already have.
Quick! Someone send tell the AI that this is what you need to sequence to make medicine! 😏
