• @Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 months ago

    Physical media or full rejection. Fuck you business school zombies squeezing blood from rocks

  • @MacStache@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 months ago

    Like it or not the majority of game purchases are digital these days. It’s a sad development for sure. I buy all my console games as physical discs myself.

    • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Same as the PS4 Pro: it’s significantly more powerful, has more storage, etc.

      The price seems crazy to me though.

      • @jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        Also explains why they raised the price on the normal PS5 - “Well, the Pro isn’t THAT much more…”

      • Traister101
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        “Significantly” Going by the comparison Sony felt large enough to brag about there’s hardly a noticeable difference

        • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          An uplift of ~45%, ray tracing going from awful to decent, hardware-accelerated upscaling (like DLSS) isn’t hardly noticeable IMO.

          More storage and WiFi 7 may not be as flashy, but they’re nonetheless improvements.

          But, you know, if that’s not good enough for you, don’t get one. Nobody’s forcing you. I know I have no desire for one. I’ve been console-free since my 360 had a red ring of death.

          • @jordanlund@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            07 months ago

            I think the trick is that the normal PS5 is already $450 (no disc drive) or $500 (with disc drive).

            So do the features on the Pro version provide an extra $200 to $330 worth of value?

            So far, as a PS5 owner, I’m not seeing it.

            • @iopq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              07 months ago

              Only if you don’t have one already. Some of the more intense games graphically have shit upscaling so they shimmer. If higher internal resolution can fix this while running at good FPS, it might be worth it for some people

              Remember that you still can’t build a gaming PC for $700 that performs similarly.

  • Lad
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 months ago

    I think the steam deck is genuinely the only console worth buying these days.

      • Farid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        Vita can Run 99% of PS1 games “natively” and has a bunch of PS2 ports (some through PSP). Not PS3 though.

        • @Facebones@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          07 months ago

          Wait can it run ps3 emulators?

          Double wait are ps3 emulators working now? I remember pscx2 or whatever being buggy as shit.

          TLDR I’m ancient in internet years

          • @anivia@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I’m gonna blow your mind by telling you there are already working PS4 and Xbox One emulators, although both only support a small number of games so far

            PS3 and Xbox 360 can be emulated very well by a modern PC, the majority of games work without glitches

            • Farid
              link
              fedilink
              English
              07 months ago

              PS4 is actually easier to emulate than PS3, because former has regular x86 architecture, but latter has a very weird CELL/PowerPC architecture CPU.

            • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              07 months ago

              PS3 is the trickiest. They had that weird Cell architecture which is more difficult to emulate than simply “less-powerful x86” emulation required for more-recent consoles.

          • Farid
            link
            fedilink
            English
            07 months ago

            To be fair, PS2 emulation is still not that great, but I guess it’s due to sheer amount of games for that system. Last summer I decided to check the PS2 emulation after 10 year break and 2 out of 3 games I tested didn’t work properly. Granted, those are kinda niche games (Transformers (2004) and Free Running), but compatibility still needs work. Hardware requirements are decently low for the games that do work, though.

          • @smort@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            07 months ago

            I’ve had good experiences emulating PS2 on my Steam Deck. PS3 I haven’t gotten anything to run well enough that I’d call it enjoyable. Some don’t run at all

          • @mrvictory1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            07 months ago

            RPCS3 can run most PS3 games but Steam Deck may fall short in some of them. Recommended specs include 6 core CPU but Deck has 4.

            • trevor (he/they)
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              It’s also worth noting that even Sony can’t be bothered to properly emulate the PS3, which has resulted in many PS3-era games being remade into either native PC versions, or PS4/5 titles.

              While it’s true that there are still some PS3-exclusive games that aren’t available in other formats, many of them are, so most people can get pretty far without needing PS3 emulation.

              I only bring that up for anyone that may think they need PS3 emulation, but maybe haven’t been made aware of newer remakes or native PC ports of the games they’re actually looking for.

            • @anivia@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              07 months ago

              Going by core count alone is a pretty shitty metric for CPU performance. The 4 core APU in the steam deck will outperform an 8 core bulldozer cpu by any metric

              • @kurcatovium@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                07 months ago

                Except for power consumption and heat generation ;-) This is where Bulldozers were hot shit!

          • @LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            That’s the one drag for me about the PS5 contrllers, the battery life before recharging. The PS3 controller did great, but the PS5 ones have so many features built in they die to quick for my liking.

          • @iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            07 months ago

            Playing witcher 2 at decent FPS only gives me 2 hours on the original steam deck

          • nelson
            link
            fedilink
            English
            07 months ago

            To be honest my steam Deck doesn’t go that far beyond 4h either on a single charge when I lower all the settings.

  • @Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 months ago

    How much space does it come out of the box? I bought my PS5 a year ago.

    It came with 667GB of space. Some games take up 100gb.

    And now you want to make it digital only??? Uhhhh, fuck that. You better be giving me like 1000 terabytes.

    • @daggermoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      I agree with the sentiment, but the games don’t play off the disc. The discs contain the game data that is installed to the SSD. You’re using the same amount of storage whether you buy games physically or digitally. I buy mine physically because I like actually owning the game I paid $70 for.

      • Saik0
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        You’re using the same amount of storage whether you buy games physically or digitally.

        The difference being that you can load the content back onto the SSD at will, and regardless of server statuses… A lot of people have bandwidth caps or live in places with shit internet speeds.

    • VindictiveJudge
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      The pro upped the storage to 2TB, but I really feel like when the PS5 launched we were at the point where they should have shipped with 4TB drives.

      • @LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        I haven’t built a new computer in awhile, but 4tb ssd would have costed more than the console when it launched would it have not? Unless you are saying they should have shipped with a hybrid SSD/HDD setup. Not sure if read/write speeds would hold up to the frame rates needed for their games now.

      • @jpeps@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        I’m not going to defend the Pro exactly, but out of curiosity what is your usecase for needing so much storage on a console? Multiple users? Bad Internet? I feel like I have a max of 1-3 active games at a time, and can just delete and download/install them as needed. Works just fine for me so I feel like something else must be going on.

        • @PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          07 months ago

          I have a 2TB SSD plugged into my 1TB Xbox. It’s all full. Average game size is 50+ gb these days. Some games easily surpass 100gb. Even with my better-than-average 300mbps connection games can easily take over an hour to download. No fucking way I’m only keeping 1-3 games and downloading as needed.

  • @Broken@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 months ago

    They talked about doing it this way at launch, which they should have. The drive is available as a peripheral, at the cost difference (actually cheaper) of the digital vs disc console. It simplifies manufacturing and distribution, which helps get more consoles on shelves. Now when it doesn’t matter as much, they implement it. Go figure.

    As far as killing off physical media, yes it pushes further that way, but honestly the game industry has been not favorable to retail stores for some time. This is the least of the offenses.

  • @PunchingWood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 months ago

    It was pretty much a given that this would happen, since there were already options with and without disc drives.

    And obviously sooner or later gaming will probably move to an entirely online service like streaming.

    It’s just a matter of time until the internet and worldwide coverage is ready for it. I always imagined that in a distant future we’d basically only buy a controller, that connects to an app that’ll let you stream. And every game will be in a subscription service like a Netflix.

      • @lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        What do you mean? If it does not have a drive, you can’t give a disc to anyone.

        I realized that that’s terrible when I compared prices of Assassin’s creed games a few years ago.

        I got AC Origins and AC Odyssee for 15 dollars (for both) on ebay. In the PS store, it was still 59.99 dollars for one (120 dollars for both). And technically, I can still sell both physical games for 10 dollars…

        • @BobGnarley@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          07 months ago

          You can still get the disc drive for it though. I mean, it is fucked up its sold separately but it isn’t just no disc drive availability at all.

  • Pika
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I think they’ve lost touch with their user base, but I also think they know that there’s some people that are just going to buy the console because they don’t have a better option available.

    Like don’t get me wrong yes it’s now the same price as a low end gaming computer and it doesn’t have upgrade capability, and doesn’t have a physical media drive, but you can put it right where your TV is, so no seperate setup so it takes up less space (PC games on a tv instead of a monitor looks weird and can be a pain to fix). Plus it’s easier to use/more user friendly and everything is in one place.

    I personally will not be upgrading past my current, as I find this generation to be super lack luster and not cost effective, but I can see why some might, I disagree with it but I see it.

  • Lucy :3
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 months ago

    Reminder that you can put in whatever you want in a PC. And that you can get a decent gaming machine for 1k (700+PS plus).
    CD Drive? No problem. DVD? Of course. Another SSD? Get some random 50$ thing and throw it in there. Floppy? Harvest some old PC and voila.

    • @polle@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      While this is true, consoles still manage to have a way more convenient experience. Its the only reason why they exist (today)

      • @vxx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        I think that’s mainly a relic from the past. I didn’t have compability or driver issues for a long time.

        Once the PC is set up, it’s as comfortable as a console. Setting the PC up to console standards is reduced to installing steam.

        • @polle@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          07 months ago

          Looks like you never played on a computer on a TV screen. The experience is plaged by pad connection problems (Bluetooth), windows popups, random no full screen issues, sound suddenly on the wrong channel, microphone not working, mouse cursor in the middle of the screen (often reset to the middle after launching the game, even when you are playing with a pad) and so on. You still need a keyboard and a mouse near your couch and there is always something. For sure iam still not paying the markup for a console, but i get why there is a big market.

          • @vxx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            What are you on about? I use my PC on my TV all the times and I don’t have a single issue you describe. I just have it connected with Hdmi. The TV even turns on and off automatic if function activate.

            • @Katana314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              07 months ago

              I’ve definitely had some of those issues. I won’t count an old issue where my GPU needed a special connection to attach audio to its DVI output (rare oddity). Some others:

              • Most computers would need to swap default audio device between whatever you use at a desk, and the TV registered as an HDMI audio device.
              • Bluetooth connections to arbitrary controllers have gotten better, but they had often needed manual enablement each time through mouse-based menus or a number of firmware updates to work with Windows/SteamOS.
              • My Steam Deck, even in its current iteration, takes some time to recognize the connected TV and swap resolution.
              • The mouse cursor issue can come up if you had to do any mouse-based option swapping, like that thing with audio devices.

              I’ve definitely gotten it working and had a blast, but the number of button presses to get to starting the game can sometimes be hard to predict. Even when I had a computer dedicated to the TV (a long time ago when SteamOS was fledgling) it was pretty unreliable about having all the right updates and not needing a mouse.

          • @TachyonTele@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            07 months ago

            You’re doing something wrong. I’ve been playing PC games on my couch for a decade and haven’t had any of those issues.

    • @InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      The real point is that you can upgrade it incrementally, you don’t have to throw it away, and upgrading will allow you to play all your old games from generation to generation without having to rebuy them for the latest Gen.

      • @essell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        Depends how old you get. After 30 years some games just don’t work like they used to!

        Thankfully we do have modern solutions for old fashioned problems now.

      • @Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        Within limits though. E.g. If your mainboard only supports old CPUs that is a huge limiting factor and we saw MS messing with older CPUs just not being supported at all by Win 11.

        Now i made the switch to Linux myself too and i am very happy, but for people who want to start somewhere, maybe starting with their own linux gaming PC is a bit much for the start.

        • @InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          07 months ago

          I think that’s overkill, but a Steam Deck is on par with a PS5, but portable, and for a cheap dock and a ps5 controller you can play it like a console.

          Linux has made such leaps though, have a container with lutris and vulkan and it can handle most basic gaming that doesn’t deal with modern AAA titles.

          • @barsquid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            07 months ago

            I got a Steam Deck because it’s a little computer. I can put my own OS on it, that’s awesome. The marketing page was talking about DIY repairs and offering spare parts, too.

          • @Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            07 months ago

            I mean i am fully in support of PC gaming and in particular Linux gaming. It is just not as easy to keep upgrading PCs component by component. Eventually there is limits, mostly from the mainboards limits.

      • Lucy :3
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        So you use your PC or console for only a year?

        • @LordGimp@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          07 months ago

          I can use it as long as I like. Ps plus just gives you 3 “free” games a month and let’s you play online with games that require ps plus. Imo the three games a month for six bucks and change is already worth it. And you keep those games for as long as you have your account, even if you don’t renew your subscription. You can also just get games that don’t require an online component, though those are becoming harder to find.

          • @TachyonTele@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Eh, on PC you can keep your games forever as long as you don’t lose the drive they’re stored on. And you don’t need to pay extra to access online features.

            And you can play any generation of games going back to pong.

          • Saik0
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            If we’re talking raw capabilities… Piracy is subscriptionless and grants you access to virtually 99% of all games from all time and across all consoles. I’m going to say that PC is the clear winner here…

            • @LordGimp@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              07 months ago

              I’m not justifying console vs PC. I’m just pointing out that the $300 on the original comment I replied to for ps plus is insane. $80 a year for a positively moderated, optimized gaming experience the vast majority of the time is worth the money imo.

    • @SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      They make pull out cup holders to put in the CD rom rive slot. There are so many goofy fun things a computer can have in it.

      • @fishbone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        Having a pull out cup holder seems insane to me, my personal rule is no drinks near my pc at all.

        That said, I have a drawer in place of my cd drive that holds all my small peripherals (thumb drives, usb to sd card adapter, stuff like that) and it’s great.

    • @iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      Floppy drives connect to the PC via ATA. I don’t have that connector in my computer