• mosscap
    link
    fedilink
    English
    05 months ago

    Trump will let this go through and behind the scenes force a deal where X buys Chrome

      • @Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        05 months ago

        Um, that wouldn’t change if Google “sells Chrome”, though.

        Firefox uses Google Search as a default, so does every Samsung phone (and most other Android devices).

        Unless the DOJ is telling everyone not to implement a default search engine (and let the user decide upon first opening the browser), then who owns Chrome really doesn’t change much.

        Other remedies the government is asking the court to impose include prohibiting Google from offering money or anything of value to third parties — including Apple and other phone-makers — to make Google’s search engine the default,

        This is the only thing that makes sense, but “sell Chrome” is a laughable request.

        • @themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          05 months ago

          Alright then I’ll do you one better:

          Google regularly abuses their market share dominance in browsers in order to push for changes to web standards that benefit them, such as their web integrity api (which would have prevented blocking ads). This is monopolistic behavior, and the largest ad company on the planet shouldn’t get to decide web standards.

          As a side note: both firefox and Samsung are paid handsomely (just like apple) to have Google as a default search engine. This also is monopolistic behavior, if you built a better product than them then you couldn’t outspend them to get to the same position.

          • @Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            05 months ago

            Oh, yeah, don’t get me wrong, Google is highly unethical, and I avoid any and all Google related products whenever possible.

            Selling Chrome, however, doesn’t really stop them from doing damage.

            The part about not allowing them to bribe pay other companies to use their search is a much better idea.

            And regarding their influence over the internet… we need stronger regulation to prevent any company from having that much control over an essential service.

  • @raynethackery@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    05 months ago

    Yeah, see all this stuff happening between now and inauguration day. See, we did something. Too little, too late. If there are ever free and fair elections in this country, and the Democrats return to power, they better get their fucking shit together. The dismantling of the Federal government will be almost impossible to reverse.

  • @ROAGO@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    05 months ago

    Why is everyone acting like this is a thing that will happen? All they have to do is wait roughly 90 days and it’ll all go away.

  • @rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    05 months ago

    They should force it to become a worker cooperative. It’s the only solution that doesn’t allow for corruption

        • @Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          My comment is more in line with the corruption aspect. As much as I think they deserve it, giving it to the employees would be more akin to them winning the lottery. In the space of a year, they will have gone public, shareholders would have stormed in and we would be at square one.

          Nationalisation at least has a chance of getting rid of the money corruption aspect. Sadly, the three letter agencies are probably deep in every browser already so I don’t think any solution takes care of that.

          I understand your point though. Personally, I will never use chrome no matter what happens, ha.

      • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        05 months ago

        Yep, nationalize everything that’s essential or at least offer a nationalized alternative and let the private sector try to compete.

  • FlashMobOfOne
    link
    fedilink
    English
    05 months ago

    Admittedly, I don’t know enough about monopolies and antitrust laws to know how much this matters. Can someone ELI5 this and give us more info?

    • @xylogx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      05 months ago

      How would that work exactly? Google would sell Chrome but keep paying teams if developers to work on Chromium?

      • @ramble81@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        05 months ago

        Basically. I mean look at Edge, it’s running Chromium under the hood, but the UI is developed by Microsoft.

  • @Potatofish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    05 months ago

    Hey look, some boomers who don’t understand tech are trying to do a thing with a tech company. Sell Chrome? What a stupid idea.

    • @stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      05 months ago

      I’m afraid that this is a terrible take. There is nothing to stop them from making it into a separate company. It would break the monopoly because the same people making the browser won’t be the ones earning the ad revenue.

        • @stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          05 months ago

          That isn’t the point, is it? Why does the government and the people care about the profits of some company?

          • @Potatofish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            05 months ago

            How do you sell something with no value. It’s a stupid premise.

            It is the point. There is no benefit to us, as in the world, if this were to happen.

            • @stoly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              It’s pretty clear that you don’t understand what antitrust is about. I might suggest you read the Wikipedia article before commenting further. Also you should maybe take a moment to consider why you are taking the side of Google, a terrible and abusive company worth hundreds of billions of dollars. They don’t need your support.

              • @Potatofish@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                05 months ago

                Pass. I’m not taking sides, I’m looking at the blowback of such a stupid decision. Maybe you should research how important chromium is to open source and stop riding the blanket antitrust chubby.

                • @stoly@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  0
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  LOL chromium is not important, it isn’t. I know you want it to be, but it’s not. There are plenty of alternatives out there, Firefox being the most obvious one. Really, stop simping for Daddy Google. You sound like an edgy teen.