Right now, on Stack Overflow, Luigi Magione’s account has been renamed. Despite having fruitfully contributed to the network he is stripped of his name and his account is now known as “user4616250”.

This appears to violate the creative commons license under which Stack Overflow content is posted.

When the author asked about this:

As of yet, Stack Exchange has not replied to the above post, but they did promptly and within hours gave me a year-long ban for merely raising the question. Of course, they did draft a letter which credited the action to other events that occurred weeks before where I merely upvoted contributions from Luigi and bountied a few of his questions.

    • @dexa_scantron@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      That’s not what the article is about. Stack Overflow has kept content that Luigi created up, but removed his username, in violation of Creative Commons. Edited the post to make that more clear.

            • @SolaceFiend@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              03 months ago

              This is the equivalent of a bank robber standing in a vault, filling his bag full of jewels. One of the hostages yelling “You can’t do this, it’s illegal.” Some other guy yells “…and yet…” minutes before police sirens can be heard outside.

              I look forward to Mangiine catching wind of this, which is basically theft, and adding it to the laundry list of things to be tried in court.

        • Queen HawlSera
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 months ago

          Indeed, I wonder if we’ll start seeing reforms before or after a copycat strikes.

          • @Hazor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            03 months ago

            I doubt before. They’re still hoping they can erase or villainize him. I expect the news media will ignore his trial in favor of whatever antics Trump or Musk are up to, and we won’t hear much about him until there’s a guilty verdict they can parade before the masses in order to dissuade them from copying him. If he does get mentioned, they’ll be trying to frame him in as negative a light as possible and downplay his motives. I also expect the big social media will censor discussion under the guise of not promoting violence, or simply shadow ban any mention of him.

    • @Whateley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      Fucking terrified. I’ve never seen corpos circle their wagons like this before. It’s hilarious.

      • Ænima
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        I know I am. I’m so sick of this system they’ve created and perpetuated for decades/centuries. I just want to live my fucking life without worrying about basic needs, or how someone with most can take even more from those who have little. Americans have more guns per capita than almost anywhere else. Those are guns in the hands of the people, not mercs or armies or private security. They should be afraid of us. They should be checking their car’s undercarriage daily before getting in. They should vary their routes daily to avoid patterns. They should see every person on the street as a potential assassin. Only THEN, will anything about these parasites’ attitudes change.

        Unfortunately, so many with the skills to engage in revolution are aligned with the interests of these corporate leeches, and thus are fighting the masses, instead of standing with them. They wanted a Civil War #2, it’s time to kick up, not down!

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          03 months ago

          Most gun owners are biggest bootlickers out there… They didn’t get weapons to fight corporate tyranny, they got them to shoot poor people they don’t like

          • @SolaceFiend@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            03 months ago

            Actually, they got them to shoot gun-wielding home invaders who threaten (if not attempt to murder) their family members.

  • @Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 months ago

    What can Stack Overflow’s motivation possibly be to strip Luigi’s account? Are their private equity owners in cahoots with health insurance executives?

    • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      A connection I may be inventing comes to mind: all the CEOs making million dollar donations to the new administration in the US.

      Basically, show you’re on the side of “law and order” and hope you’re not caught up in any purges.

    • Chozo
      link
      fedilink
      03 months ago

      It’s pretty standard when a highly-publicized murder suspect’s online profiles are discovered. Platform admins will typically disable/hide their accounts from the public while investigations/trials are ongoing. This is hardly unique to Luigi.

        • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 months ago

          It probably wouldn’t, because it’s unlikely anyone is going to do the work, especially since there are a lot of jurisdictions involved. That’s a lot of work for a relatively small userbase.

        • @0x0@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 months ago

          It would depend on the software in use, but i think the instance admin could probably delete the account. About renaming… maybe, fiddling with the database. Again, depends on the software (and admin).

      • @dexa_scantron@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        Do you have other examples? Because the article gave an example of a similar account that was not anonynized like this. Sure, accounts are often taken down, but the content isn’t left up.

      • @SolaceFiend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I’m starring this cause I want to look into this myself, and if I find any technical sources that address this claim and actually detail this as a SOP, I’ll reply with that source later, or otherwise reply with “I didn’t find anything.”

  • @solomon42069@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 months ago

    Is there a mirror for Stacks content? I’ve been concerned for some time that they are a vital resource that a corporation could ruin at any moment.

      • @solomon42069@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        I’ve looked into this but they aren’t exactly small, it’s not a straightforward operation for even the average developer or systems engineer to restore these into a working format.

        I was thinking we need something along the lines of a read only public mirror run by the proper open source community - e.g. SourceForge or a major Linux project… ISP’s and universities offer mirrors of Linux packages so this could be a resource offered in the same vein. That’s my line of thinking as far as a StackOverflow mirror goes anyway!

        • @486@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Of course they aren’t small, but they are probably as small as it gets, since they are pretty efficiently compressed. I am not sure what you mean by

          it’s not a straightforward operation for even the average developer or systems engineer to restore these into a working format

          since it is really trivial to use them. Just load them with Kiwix and serve them as a website. It doesn’t get much easier than that.

          • @solomon42069@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I was referring to the file size being the barrier. The 2024 large database size of 202GB is prohibitive for the average person’s resource capabilities. i.e. I have a home VPS host and I don’t even have that much free space. Your cloud operating costs would also go up with the storage and bandwidth use.

            There’s also two separate issues I was kinda mixing up. I’m a developer who uses StackOverflow and would like to use a resource that is readily available. I think it’d take a few hours to setup even a smaller copy of SO, which isn’t ideal for answering a quick question. I also don’t want to setup a whole mirror site with custom work just for myself and because I’m paranoid Microsoft miight buy them and paywall SO overnight or something.

            • CodexArcanum
              link
              fedilink
              English
              03 months ago

              I looked into doing something similar with Winipedia and the recommendation is also to use Kiwix, and the offline file size is also very large.

              Welcome to the collapse! Hoarding “clean data” for personal use is like hoarding clean water and food: you need a place to keep it, and it starts going stale the minute you shelve it. So either buy a digital bunker to load up with what you need or ask the all knowing AI gods for answers like the other poors.

              Also the Stack Exchange software used to be open source, surely there’s still a fork somewhere. You could certainly run your own Developer QA site, but like with Lemmy, the problem then is getting enough traffic to be able to productively tap into the collective wisdom.

              • @solomon42069@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                03 months ago

                I’m hoping community efforts are able to fill the void. I fear having to do this all myself and becoming some kind of Mad Max style tinkerer after the fall…

                Old phones daisy changed together to act as a server… The remnants of StarLink for internet, getting nazi/rape threats from the remaining social media AI that live in all the satellites…

                It would be nice if government backed up Wikipedia and SO. But considering they don’t give a shit about Linux which is arguably one of the most vital technical infrastructure projects of our lifetime…

            • @486@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              03 months ago

              When hosting this locally, I don’t see how 200 GB is much of an issue. Storage is so cheap these days, if you want to host it locally, just buy a 256 GB SSD just for that data for $20. Anyway, you were asking for a mirror, to which I replied with the information about the ZIM files. I don’t really understand the issue. Stackoverflow just isn’t that small, there is not much you can do about that.

              I think it’d take a few hours to setup even a smaller copy of SO, which isn’t ideal for answering a quick question.

              The download? Maybe, depends on your Internet connection’s speed. Actually serving it as a website certainly doesn’t take hours. It is rather a matter of seconds.

  • poo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 months ago

    Stack Overflow fucking sucks, it’s dead.

      • @vane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        The next thing seems to be the discord (or any instant messenger ) channel for the project. That’s my wild guess. I don’t like it but looks like people are shifting from the web to instant communicators, so the knowledge is not perserved.
        Thanks AI

  • FaceDeer
    link
    fedilink
    03 months ago

    Stack Overflow has been toxic for a long time already. It’s one of the things that a lot of people seem pleased to see AI devour.

    • oce 🐆
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      I’ve read it is still well valued because people will keep asking questions there when LLM can’t answer, so they remain a precious source of post LLM curated Q&A.

      • jawa21
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        That might be true if any human could reasonably ask a question there now. Ask a question, and you are likely going to see it removed for a variety of reasons.

        • oce 🐆
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          To be honest, I had a bad experience a few years ago when I wanted to try contributing, and I never tried again. Yet, I think it’s really hard to strike a balance of freedom and constrains for organically curated Q&A, so I try not to be too fast on judging them considering the service that they indubitably provided to millions of people.

        • @Goun@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 months ago

          Until it’s just AIs answering questions asked by other AIs while human admins block human accounts…

        • FaceDeer
          link
          fedilink
          03 months ago

          Yeah, AI has become good enough at this point that you can provide it with a large blob of context material - such as API documentation, source code, etc. - and then have it come up with its own questions and answers about it to create a corpus of “synthetic data” to train on. And you can fine-tune the synthetic data to fit the format and style that you want, such as telling it not to be snarky or passive-aggressive or whatever.

            • FaceDeer
              link
              fedilink
              03 months ago

              And yet the synthetic training data works, and models trained on it continue scoring higher on the benchmarks than ones trained on raw Internet data. Claim what you want about it, the results speak louder.

              • @JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                03 months ago

                This is the peak, though. They require new data to get better but most of the available new data is adulterated with AI slop. Once they start eating themselves it’s over.

                • FaceDeer
                  link
                  fedilink
                  03 months ago

                  You are speaking of “model collapse”, I take it? That doesn’t happen in the real world with properly generated and curated synthetic data. Model collapse has only been demonstrated in highly artificial circumstances where many generations of model were “bred” exclusively on the outputs of previous generations, without the sort of curation and blend of additional new data that real-world models are trained with.

                  There is no sign that we are at “the peak” of AI development yet.

              • knightly the Sneptaur
                link
                fedilink
                English
                03 months ago

                The results aren’t worth the expense. So-called “AI” is the biggest bubble since the great recession.

                • @Ledivin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  03 months ago

                  Nah, I’m still giving that one to the blockchain. LLMs are going to be useful for a while, but Ethereum still hasn’t figured out a real use, and they’re the only ones that haven’t given up and moved fully into coin gambling.

              • justOnePersistentKbinPlease
                link
                fedilink
                03 months ago

                No, they can only take from things in their models.

                Moreover, all of them use statistics, typically Bayesian, to get the results. What you get from an LLM is essentially an average* of the model data. This is why feeding LLM output into a model is so toxic, it’s already the average.

                • Yes I know it’s not really the average, but for laymen us good enough comparison.
                • @naught101@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  03 months ago

                  They only take from the statistical distributions of words in the context of preceding words (which is why they never say “the the” etc, why the grammar is nearly always correct). But that doesn’t mean that whole sentences are lifted from the source material. There are near infinite paths through those word distributions, and many have never been produced by humans, so LLMs do produce sentences that have never been uttered before.

                  They couldn’t produce new conceptual context spaces in the way that humans can sometimes, but they can produce new combinations within existing context spaces.

  • @Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 months ago

    Despite having fruitfully contributed to the network he is stripped of his name and his account is now known as “user4616250”.

    Inspector Javert aah behaviour.

  • Zier
    link
    fedilink
    03 months ago

    user4616250 will now be a famous meme. “How do we fix healthcare? We call user4616250.”

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      A musician needs to write a catchy tune to put the name to so people will remember the numbers.

      • jawa21
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        It will likely take months, but I’m gonna try. I might give up before it is done, though.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 months ago

          I believe in you. If it isn’t the new 867-5309, hopefully it will at least be the next 6060-842.

            • @flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Luigi, Luigi, who can I turn to?
              You give me something I can hold onto!
              Things can’t stay the way that they were before
              It’s time to put some villains up on the wall!

              Luigi I got your number!
              I think it’s hero time!
              Luigi don’t change your number!

              Four six one six two five oh!
              Four six one six two five oh!
              Four six one six two five oh!
              Four six one six two five oh!

              Luigi Luigi you’re the guy for me
              Oh, you don’t know me but you make me so happy. I tried to free you but I lost my nerve. I said “nullification” but I got censored

              Luigi I got your number. I think it’s hero time. Luigi don’t change your number

              Four six one six two five oh!
              Four six one six two five oh!
              Four six one six two five oh!
              Four six one six two five oh!

              I got it (I got it) I got it
              Put those assholes on the wall!
              I got it (I got it) I got it
              For the good of, for the good of us all!

              Luigi, Luigi who can we turn to
              (Four six one six two five oh)
              To know our pain, we can always turn to you. (Four six one six two five oh)

      • Zier
        link
        fedilink
        03 months ago

        “calling user 461-62-50, he’s our dude, what he does is nifty!” :)

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Nice and catchy, but it needs to be catchy with more digits. Tommy “Tutone” Heath is still alive. I’m just saying.

    • CurlyWurlies4All
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Do not forget me user4616250

      Look down, look down You’ll always be a slave Look down, look down You’re standing in your grave

      • @Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        "He knew that man was me Without a second glance! That Micky Ds employee spotted me The crime stoppers bounty is his chance!

        Why should I try to hide? Why should I go unkown When I have come so far And struggled for so long?

        If I speak, I am condemned. If I stay silent, they have won!

        I am the ceo slayer that got away. They all are looking at me. How can I abandon them? How would they live If I am not free?

        If I speak, I am condemned. If I stay silent, I am damned!

        Who am I? Should not this wage slave benefit Pretend I do not feel his agony This innocent who can be set free

        Who else should face their judgment Who am I? Can I conceal myself for evermore? Pretend I am the man I was before? And hide my crime until I die

        Be no more than an alibi? Must I lie?

        How can I ever face my fellow men? How can I ever face myself again? My fate belongs to capitlism, I know I made that bargain long ago I gave them hope when hope was gone I gave them strength to journey on

        [He appears in front of the court]

        Who am I? Who am I? I’m Luigi!

        [He unbuttons his shirt to reveal the scares of a botched surgery]

        And so UHC, you see it’s true This man bears no more guilt than you! Who am I?

        user4616250!

  • @OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 months ago

    On Stack Exchange, all of the contributions on the site are contributed under a license maintained by a third party called Creative Commons […] the work remains properly attributed.

    This is the main issue IMO

  • @buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 months ago

    Here’s a fun fact I just recently came across. In the medieval times when the church wanted to remove a heretic, someone who was speaking out in opposition to church doctrine, they would burn those people at the stake. The reason they would do this was not because this was a common practice to burn people at the stake but in order to prevent relics of the heretics from being collected and giving their followers something to rally around.

    I think Luigi’s Stack Overflow history is a relic of his existence and something people could rally around and the powerful don’t want that to exist.

  • @OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I cross posted this to Hacker News (which is very pro-CEO and big corpo) and it’s now rank 1 on the front page, lmao. People really support this guy

    (And it’s funny because in the comments, people are seething “Nooooo he’s not popular, look at these polls that show he has 13% approval!!”)

    (Not sharing link to avoid brigade)

    • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      Can’t have a “terrorist” demonstrating his competence and productivity after all.

      The overlords know they’ve really fucked up when the competent, productive people start getting resentful and side-eyeing the system.

      • @0x0@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        True, although it may also be “good things” done by person do not outweigh “bad thing” done by person. I’m sure there’s a name for that.
        Like human experimentation. Yes, bad, shouldn’t be done, outright illegal, immoral, inhumane, but has been done. Should we discard the scientific results?

        • @bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 months ago

          There should be efforts to duplicate the results in an ethical way, the lack of rigorous ethics indicates biases. If you tortured a guy for research, did you also do less bad things like falsify results?

          The Stanford prison experiment is a good example, afaik they published in several journals and I don’t believe any of them have printed retractions. There are huge problems with the methodology that are still being discussed, and the results are still being referenced.

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          03 months ago

          Obviously no… We hired these criminals so they can keep doing these experiments in the US!

      • @ansiz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        Don’t worry everyone, the new President is going to rename the Gulf of Mexico and annex Greenland, so that will take care of it!