• @slaacaa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    011 months ago

    Nothing says you believe in free market competition more, than suing a another private business, trying to force them to give you money

  • @Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Anyone getting sued by him should just demand a jury trial. No way you’ll get enough Americans to side with musk on anything.

  • Darth_Mew
    link
    fedilink
    English
    010 months ago

    so a south African is suing a swiss company in American court? why just why is this theatrical bullshit allowed to go on so sick of this already times be changing too slowly we need the next phase already

    • @Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      Its an american company suing an american subsidiary of a swiss company. It makes sense. You dont have to try very hard to find the ridiculousness in these people but this isnt it.

  • @xenomor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    011 months ago

    The lesson here is to never start advertising on that platform. You’re less likely to be sued by Musk if you never start advertising in the first place. Advertising on his platform is an unnecessary risk for your business:

  • no banana
    link
    fedilink
    English
    011 months ago

    I didn’t know Citizens United gave companies forced speech.

    • Random_Character_A
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You can also have friends if you just pay mercenaries to kidnap them from the street at gunpoint. Many many great friends at any time.

    • @halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 months ago

      You just know that’s going to be exhibit 1 for the defense.

      Fucking fascist Nazi man baby doesn’t like when advertisers do what he tells them, and then continues to do so when he realizes that was a bad idea.

      • @JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 months ago

        Reminds me of the guy who was accused by his gf of impregnating her, then refusing to support the child. Went through everything: the lawyers, friends and family who questioned his manhood and unwilling ess to take responsibility for the child, harassment, threats from her friends, etc. finally ended up in court in front of a judge, where he calmly produced a letter from a doctor that had performed a vasectomy on him well before the child could possibly have been conceived, took the win and walked out.

        I would pay to watch this rich spoilt man child have to eat his literal words. I’m sure it’s screenshotted all over the internet, but his ego won’t let him see the truth.

        • @Cypher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          011 months ago

          FYI a vasectomy isn’t a 100% guarantee against getting a woman pregnant as it can sometimes heal, even years after.

          A DNA test should still have been ordered in that circumstance.

  • @Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    011 months ago

    How is this even a thing? Is a bank run considered collusion? If the platform no longer offers the audience I want to reach then I should be able to stop advertising on it. It just happens that the audience of may companies at once left the company. Who is even entertaining this lawsuit?

    • John Richard
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 months ago

      Most politicians are bought for less than a million. The guy has hundreds of billions. I imagine he can buy a few judges along the way.

      • @halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 months ago

        Possibly, but none of those bought judges matter unless it ends up in their specific court. That’s why they’ve been trying to install as many of their own as possible.

    • @KnightontheSun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 months ago

      On the scale of who is fucking up the world more, I’d have to award the trophy to Leon. Certainly fuck Nestle, but won’t someone please rid us of this meddlesome billionaire?

      • @ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Elon is a twat and a menace for sure, but Nestlé have employed business strategies that literally killed infants and caused malnourishment…they are a completely different league of evil, far far worse than what Elon has done so far.

  • @Shortstack@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    011 months ago

    No better way to get people who used to voluntarily give you money to give you more money than threatening them.

    • @barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Plenty actually, like former slaves from plantations which sold products to Nestle.

      …it’s part of the reason why Nestle is currently lobbying the EU to not dilute the supply chain act, those kinds of cases are a PITA for them, and the documentation they need to do for the supply chain act is exactly what they need to nib cases in the bud, “Here’s the inspections we did, here are transcripts of anonymous interviews with random workers at the plantation”, “If something slipped between the cracks we deeply regret that but we did do our due diligence, plaintiff’s beef is with their ex boss, not with us”.

      It is absolutely more expensive to pay an army of lawyers to defend yourself than it is to pay workers proper local wages and document that. Not to mention that people who run slave plantations don’t share their extra profit with Nestle.

      The other reason is that they don’t want smaller companies to have a competitive advantage: Smaller companies are not subject to those kinds of lawsuits, and also the ones complaining about the supply chain act. Nestle is also not at all keen on a consumer boycott from Africa.