• @Wojwo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 months ago

      Well has anything trump has said sounded well thought out. He’s like the villain from Meet the Robinsons

    • Balder
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      That’s exactly how I felt when Bolsonaro was in power in Brazil. He at least became ineligible for being responsible for our equivalent of the capitol invasion in Brasília, and is possibly going to jail.

      It still baffles me that the US is supposed to be a country where laws work more strictly, and yet everything Trump did in his previous term—from obstruction of justice to inciting the January 6th Capitol riot—seems to have been met with limited accountability. How can a nation uphold its democratic principles if the mechanisms designed to check power are perceived as being selectively applied?

      • Rentlar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 months ago

        The main difference is that the Brazilian Supreme Court judges have a spine, while American SC judges have an RV.

      • @peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 months ago

        I mean, technically, we have a federal republic.

        While there is supposed to be a division of powers, because it was combined with the first past the post system, it becomes a split political mess, because the combinatorics virtually guaranteed this outcome at some point.

        Additionally, instead of a parliamentary republic, just like Brazil, we have the presidential system, which leads to the same problems you guys got with Bolsanaro. Quite literally everything you hear in the media and by our government regarding democracy is and has been propaganda. States have some democratic processes, but for the large part that’s not even true.

        The founding fathers were of course aware of all this. They just figured it was useful while separating from Britain and establishing the country, and over time it would better itself because enlightened individuals would remain in power dedicated towards “the more perfect Republic.”

        Obviously that didn’t happen and here we are.

      • ✺roguetrick✺
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        where laws work more strictly

        That’s never been the case. If anything we’ve been a major source of corruption on the world and particularly for South America for the last 150-200 years. Shit you could easily frame the Cuban revolution and the reaction to American corrupt interests and draw a straight line from drug cartels and bribing coups as well.

  • @SavageCoconut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Lol, Trump is a clown. If netflix or other big tech is charging me for using their service in my country, and they have legal presence and activity in my country, they should be charged taxes in my country because they are generating econimic activity.

  • @plumbercraic@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 months ago

    Thanks Mr Trump - this really helps us sell our non-US technology to the Europeans. Keep on making stuff great again 🤘

  • @RecallMadness@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 months ago

    He didn’t say anything about regulating them.

    Tax revenue is small fry compared to the harm they can (and do?) cause.

  • @Embargo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 months ago

    I’m in Australia and I would like to say something about that. Come at us you stupid fascist cunt.

    • Singletona082
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 months ago

      American here.

      They’re like any other bully.

      Break their nose.

    • Zier
      link
      fedilink
      02 months ago

      As an American, I support this statement.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 months ago

    I desperately desperately desperately want to read a headline that says “Ukraine signs rare mineral agreement with the European Union. Ukraine becomes a member of the EU and the EU gets large resources of rare minerals to supercharge their own homegrown tech industry and divest it from the United States of Trump”

    • @Peck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 months ago

      Why would you expect that? Wasn’t the whole deal first offered by Zelensky anyways? He was offering this along with using Ukrainian people as combat slaves.

      • Hemingways_Shotgun
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 months ago

        I don’t expect it. I just hope for it because it would be the most big-dick-energy move Zelensky can pull on Trusk.

    • @Snowstorm@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 months ago

      Didn’t Trump just told everyone where to retaliate against his tariff for maximum pain in the US and on his priorities?

      Those digital service taxes need to grow way higher!

  • @NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 months ago

    Wonder what the correct answer is… should everybody in the world put even higher taxes on big tech now, or better taxes + tariffs?

  • Alphane Moon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I think the world would be a better place if we collectively perma-banned all American digital services (while helping NGOs/open source projects relocate their infrastructure and legal organisations out of the US).

    There would be a lot more competition, a wider variety of product offerings, more regional customisation, a bigger focus on long tail services.

    It would be messy at first, but that’s the nature of a transition from an oligarch model to a competitive model.

    • @SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 months ago

      Yes, in the new “might is right” world Trump is pushing for, it’s better to start pushing back or get pushed over. In his “make a deal” world view, better to say to ban everything outright in two weeks. In his typical fashion, some compromises might appears the next day. Losing a few hundred million customers and large amounts of influence will sting him and his supporters.

      • Alphane Moon
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 months ago

        I would argue the goal should be actually permanently getting rid of American technology services as opposed to getting a deal.

        By this point American business leaders (not only in tech) have decisively proven that they are not any better than say russian oligarchs; a group of corrupt criminals who will happily support authoritarianism as long as they get to keep their businesses interests.

        • @WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Plus allowing another countries tech to be embedded into government and services, military, and any other critical operations is an omnipresent national security risk. Doesn’t matter if they’re an ally.

          Democracies should be run on 100% open source. The developed world could collectively employ less engineers than big tech and I am certain they could produce a better ecosystem of services, both through contributions to existing projects as well as greenfield, that would also provide wide reaching benefits to every other economy… and they could do it cheaper than big tech. It’s easy to beat private companies that must enshittify to achieve constant profit growth.