• @danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    028 days ago

    What’s the best alternative? I have a fire cube, and I’m getting sick of it. Apple TV? Is there a FOSS solution that’s close to the same quality interface?

    • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      028 days ago

      TL; DR - No. But actually maybe, depending on what you’re looking for and what you can put up with.

      Are you looking to access streaming services? Or are you okay with self-hosting?

      The FOSS solutions that support streaming services are pretty janky IMO because they don’t have support from the service, so you’re probably better off hooking up a laptop running Linux and access stuff in a browser. I had Netflix working through Kodi on a Raspberry Pi, for example, but like I said, it was super janky. Maybe it’s better now, idk, but check out OpenELEC and Kodi. You’ll need some hardware to run it on.

      If you can self-host your videos, Jellyfin is pretty great, and I think there are a couple more options. You’ll need to get the content yourself though and connect it to the TV somehow (e.g. the Jellyfin app if you have a smart TV).

    • @underisk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      The best is unironically to pirate and use something like Kodi on a SBC that can run libreElec.

    • @frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      028 days ago

      I have a Raspberry Pi 500 running PiOS that works well like a computer to just play things in browser. No ads or anything of course. But also no casting from a phone or anything

    • ThePowerOfGeek
      link
      fedilink
      English
      028 days ago

      Some good options already listed. But here’s another.

      Hey an Android TV box (Onn brand or similar) and install an open source launcher on it, like Projectivity. You have to use adb to disable the default launcher after the new launcher is installed, otherwise it keeps defaulting back to the default one. But once don’t it’s smooth sailing. You have a dedicated streaming device with a remote control and a nice UI with zero ads on the home screen.

    • @Sl00k@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      028 days ago

      I see this thrown around a lot.

      90% of us watch Netflix, Plex, YT TV or some other streaming service, how do I watch these with 4k quality without connecting to the Internet? That’s just an unrealistic request for 90% of TV users.

      • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        028 days ago

        If you have some technical knowhow, you can configure your router to let things like Netflix through, but not the rest of the OS. Or you can try your luck with PiHole or similar.

        • @Sl00k@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          028 days ago

          I personally do have the capabilities I’m just pointing out this is unrealistic for 99% of TV watchers.

      • @bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        028 days ago

        Use a separate, not ad-riddled device plugged in via HDMI. If you have a game console it can do this.

        I don’t know what’s good for Android TV boxes it used to be the NVIDIA Shield was a well regarded streaming device but it’s really old now. Google makes one (Google TV Streamer) and you can install a custom launcher if you’re a bit technical and the “suggested content” of the stock launcher bothers you. Same for other Android TV boxes.

        Apple, like them or not, makes a really decent TV box with no system level ads and an interface that mostly stays out of the way.

    • @scala@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      028 days ago

      Technically you can get commercial TVs but many companies stopped selling them. They are literally the new screen tech with no “Smart” capabilities. They are also much cheaper than their smart counterparts.

      • @Bristingr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        028 days ago

        I must not be looking at the right thing. All I’m finding are expensive displays that have all this fancy scheduling, web surfing, etc. built into it.

      • @CatZoomies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        028 days ago

        Just a heads up that the Smart Cancer has already begun infecting PC monitors. Samsung makes Smart Monitors.

        It won’t be long before there are no longer Dumb Monitors.

      • @surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        028 days ago

        Wish it had more apps, but Apple TV is pretty solid. With the Steam link app, it’s also good for couch gaming on your pc.

        • Darren
          link
          fedilink
          English
          028 days ago

          We use Moonlight instead of Steam Link. It requires a little more setting up at the PC end, but overall seems to be a more smooth result.

                • @metaldream@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  026 days ago

                  With steam for me it took longer to connect, it was harder to set up and the stream itself had noticeable artifacts and lag.

                  With sunshine & moonlight my lag is 1 ms, it connects instantly and I can stream in 4K HDR. Like I said it’s so high quality that I often forget I’m streaming the game.

                  Plus moonlight is free and open source. Takes maybe 5-10 mins to set up. I was skeptical because it’s FOSS, but it’s easily the streaming solution I’ve tried for gaming.

                  This is on Windows over LAN, I haven’t tried it over the internet.

          • @flightyhobler@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            028 days ago

            Witch brands have moonlight available natively? I think I remember Samsung. Anything else? LG doesn’t…

    • Lka1988
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      A Sharp Aquos TV from the late 2000s, pre-Hisense days. We have a 42" model from ~2007. It’s only 1080p (which is honestly just fine for its size and our usage), but there’s plenty of I/O for modern and legacy equipment, and lots of configuration options. It is an absolute monster at 75 lbs, but an incredibly high quality unit nonetheless, especially considering it’s age. I’ve owned it since 2019 and it’s needed zero repairs or anything.

      For comparison, we also have a much newer 55" curved Samsung TV (in our basement, wall-mounted up high) which has already needed a backlight driver board replacement. Luckily that was only $50, but still, I expect better.

      • Corhen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        027 days ago

        the largest problem with older TV’s isnt the resolution. even on my 75" its hard to tell the difference between 4k and 1080p… But HDR is amazing, it really blows me away each time a scene lights up!

        • Lka1988
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          27 days ago

          That’s a fair point. HDR is quite nice, I use it a lot on my Pixel. The TV I mentioned does have dynamic brightness, but that’s over the whole TV, not really equivalent to HDR.

    • RedEye FlightControl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      028 days ago

      Buy a commercial signage display. It’s just a TV without the smart garbage.

      Or, get a projector :)

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      Or better yet, use a Pi-Hole or something similar to block the relevant adservers at the DNS level.

      • Hellmo_luciferrari
        link
        fedilink
        English
        029 days ago

        I wouldn’t say this is “better”

        I do run a pihole, but I still will never connect my roku to the internet. It is much better to have a media PC or other streaming device I have control of fully connected.

        • Snot Flickerman
          link
          fedilink
          English
          029 days ago

          True, but most people are buying off-the-shelf stuff and they don’t have their own localized piracy-enabled libraries with a Jellyfin server.

          Further, I’m pretty sure you’ve got to connect your Roku at least once to install player apps like Jellyfin. But maybe you don’t, I’m not at all familiar with if you can sideload on a Roku.

          • Hellmo_luciferrari
            link
            fedilink
            English
            028 days ago

            For any streaming, Netflix, YouTube, or anything I would always use a computer. Not some awful app on a slow device. No screen of mine needs to be anything besides a screen.

        • @Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          028 days ago

          Amen. I run a PiHole, and also just use lil computers on all of my screens and download anything I watch and put it on a lil server they all can stream from! No ads, best quality!

        • Snot Flickerman
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          I’ve always just done it manually by viewing the Pi-Hole logs for the device I am on while the ad is loading. It takes getting into the weeds a bit.

          Further, I don’t have a Roku so I’ve never looked into it myself.

          That being said, a quick search brought up this hosts file:

          https://gist.github.com/sidward35/cea28bedd0ec0b1bceec8c2b22c163c4

          Adlist for Pi-hole with domains for Roku, LG, and Samsung

          Not sure if it’s current or not. Lots of threads about Roku ads making it through after being previously blocked.

    • @tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      028 days ago

      Don’t connect your Roku to the internet.

      I thought that Roku was some kind of streaming service to a device. Doesn’t that need to be Internet-connected to function?

      kagis

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roku

      Ah. Apparently that’s what they originally did, but they’ve also subsequently come out with smart TVs, which I assume can operate without an Internet connection.

      • GreyBeard
        link
        fedilink
        English
        028 days ago

        Roku started as a streaming media box. You paid them money, they gave you a box that could play Netflix and Youtube. It was a simple transaction. Unfortunately, at some point they decided to start selling/giving their OS to TV manufacturers. This was actually nice at the start. You got a smart TV who’s “Smarts” were designed by competent people. A revolution at the time. But the drive to drop prices lower and lower meant that there was no margin on the TV, which means Roku had to investigate other ways of making their revenue, AKA Ads and selling data.

        Of course, the stand alone box probably would have went that way anyways, but at least with selling a dedicated box, there is a clear financial benefit without the need to get invasive.

  • @_sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    028 days ago

    This is why I disconnected my parents Roku tv from the internet last year, when they started to get updates that wouldn’t download, and freeze the whole tv, i said enough is enough

  • @MiniMoose4Free@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    029 days ago

    My vizio tv auto plays shows, ads, and light music if you leave it idling too long after you turn it on. Moving the remote down just once disables it till the next time your on home screen.

  • @gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    029 days ago

    For years I was a big fan of Roku. It represented a better value alternative from the big corporations pushing their own agenda like Google, Apple, Samsung, and Amazon. They made products that were intuitive and user oriented and carved out a very nice and stable market share for themselves because of it. Now they’re just leveraging their hardware relationships to transform the software into something terrible.

    I used to look for tvs with Roku built in. Now I’ve disabled Roku features from my smart TVS and use a separate streaming device.

    • @jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      028 days ago

      I think the issue is they hit market saturation and haven’t been able to develop any real revenue streams beyond the sale of devices (which is one time cost while maintenance and development constantly drain them of any profit).

      I suspect the increased enshitification is because they need other revenue streams. Just take a look at their stock price and it doesn’t paint a great picture for them.

      • @gedaliyah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        028 days ago

        I think it depends on the model, but there should be something in the power settings to change the startup device. I did a factory reset first to clear any network settings or user data, skipped the setup, and set it to startup on the HDMI input.

  • @Brotha_Jaufrey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    I only ever tried using a Roku so I could stream my PC to my smart TV, but it turns out there’s MASSIVE latency. Of course I returned it. If I had to deal with that AND ADS, I would have set that shit on fire

      • @Brotha_Jaufrey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        028 days ago

        At the moment I just have an old laptop and connect it to my TV via hdmi and installed Parsec on both devices. It’s a nice, free method.

        In the future though I do want to look into getting a mini PC and doing essentially the same thing except it could be an individual device for the most part.

  • @Tantheiel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    028 days ago

    So glad I blocked my TVs access to the Internet at the router level. Never complainrd about not setting up a network if the network doesn’t work.

      • @Toribor@corndog.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        027 days ago

        Wake on LAN. At least that’s what I do. I can turn on the TV and adjust the volume from Home Assistant but the TV itself can’t reach the Internet.

      • @Tantheiel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        027 days ago

        I used Netflix on my TV but after the password sharing and other issues I choose to block network access.

        Most of my Internet is done on my computer.

      • JackbyDev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        028 days ago

        What a goofy thing to ask. You know exactly why people use smart TVs on the Internet.

  • @oyo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    028 days ago

    If this happens on my box I’ll be taking them to small claims court and let you all know how it goes…

  • AmbiguousProps
    link
    fedilink
    English
    029 days ago

    Roku is bad, I have one older Roku ““smart”” tv that I just block from accessing the internet entirely, and use a shield with a custom launcher instead.

      • AmbiguousProps
        link
        fedilink
        English
        029 days ago

        So, I use regex to block all Roku domains on my network via pihole:

        (ads|logs|cloudservices|image|images|web|prod.mobile|wwwimg|captive|customer-feedbacks|amoeba|amoeba2|sr|giga.sb|cs).roku(.admeasurement)*.com$

        Then, possibly overkill due to the above, I used OpnSense firewall rules to block all traffic from my Roku tv. I think I just got fed up with seeing Roku spam in my pihole, as the above regex seems to completely “break” Roku.

        After that, I set up FLauncher (following the method #2 instructions on the gitlab page) on my shield. This makes it so I only see the Roku launcher for a few seconds while the shield starts up, and then I’m dropped straight into flauncher. I chose flauncher because it’s very simple and barebones, so you might want to explore other options if you want more advanced features. I don’t really need those features since I’m usually using an app anyway.

    • @firadin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      028 days ago

      Is there any point in getting anything above the bottom tier Shield? Just trying to use it to replace my chromecast/stream tv and youtube

      • limonfiesta
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        Nvidia has destroyed the stock Shield TV experience with ads, but it’s easy to install custom launchers like Projectivy. The underlying system is still a privacy nightmare, but I don’t care that Nvidia knows what TV shows I watch.

        I mean, I do care, just not enough to use something like Kodi as my primary TV interface. Maybe if I used any ad supported services I’d feel differently, but I don’t, so meh.

        • @fishpen0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          028 days ago

          Lemmy especially sleeps on the Apple TV more than most communities. It’s a solid box that has no ads and no privacy issues. Plex, Jellyfin, etc… all installable. With apples track record on previous versions of the Apple TV, software updates and support for about a decade

          • @firadin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            028 days ago

            I assume being Apple that it’s not possible to sideload apps not supported on the app store? In particular I’d like to use some kind of a SmartTube or other youtube app that is ad free

            • @fishpen0@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              028 days ago

              You can use sideloadly but IIRC you need a Mac for it to work. My YouTube workflow is a YouTube-dl wrapper that pipes into jellyfin for the small handful of things I still watch from YT, so I’m less familiar with live YouTube interfaces to know which ones are out there.

            • @AtariDump@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              028 days ago

              That is correct.

              But which do you want? Privacy or convenience? No one makes a streaming device that does both.

      • @consumptionone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        028 days ago

        I have been using an onn 4k streaming box, which runs Google TV. They’re $20. It’s pretty easy to disable the default launcher and have it boot to Flauncher. Then you can side load smart tube for an ad free YouTube experience asking with Plex, stremio, or whatever else you want to stream.

        • @grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          028 days ago

          I’ve got a couple of those that I bought shortly after the LTT video, but I’m still using my Roku because I still haven’t gotten around to jailbreaking and configuring them.

  • @PeteZa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    028 days ago

    It’s 1000% worth it to spend a little extra on a TV to get one that runs Google TV. Android is just superior compared to Roku in this regard. I actually have an Apple TV 4K as well, and regularly switch between the two.

      • @PeteZa@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        028 days ago

        That’s such a cool and novel opinion. Wow. My Android TV does everything I need it to right out of the box. Never fucking shows me advertisements, and actually made it easier for me to stop paying for an overpriced Hulu subscription.

          • @PeteZa@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            028 days ago

            I don’t really understand the hate for Android TV. It’s pretty obvious to me (since I use both) that they’re trying to compete with Apple TV. Android TV has a lot of great settings and features. When I’m not doing anything with it, it automatically shows a screensaver of my choosing - just like Apple TV does. I have quick and easy access to the movies I’ve purchased on my YouTube account as well.

            Any assumption that Android TV will force ads on its users tells me they haven’t used it.

    • @Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      028 days ago

      Manufacturers need to put the cheap ass software on a cheap ass $20 stick. Stop fucking up TVs with it. Stop accepting any ‘smart’ features and stop calling them smart. They’re invasive advertisement platforms, full fucking stop. It is in fact NOT worth it to get a google TV, because they’ll pull this shit or worse next week. We had perfectly functional TVs for decades before this shit, stop acting like the only choice is to surrender your hardware.

    • @dan1101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      028 days ago

      So far. And I actually prefer the Roku UI even though the Google TV will do more things, like let you sideload apps. Roku is propietary.

      • @Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        028 days ago

        The sad thing is Roku’s UI was pretty dang good before they added a row of ads at the top, a half screen ad on the left and replaced the background with an ad every 2 weeks, waiting a full minute for it to load the latest nonsense the highest bidder paid them to shove in my face. The ads absolutely ruin a good platform.

      • @PeteZa@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        028 days ago

        So far what?

        Even if they do start putting ads on Android TV, all I have to do is switch over to my Apple TV. That’s the best performing streaming device on the market, regardless of your opinion on Apple.