Discord was already succumbing to enshitification. Now with their intention to be owned by Wall Street, that trajectory will certainly accelerate at warp speed once the change of hands happens.

Anyone already get ahead of this and find a solid alternative?

Right now I’m on the fence between Element for Matrix, and Revolt. Both seem to have their pros and cons and I can’t find a clear “winner”.

  • @Kuvwert@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 month ago

    Ah this is so exciting!

    Discord ‘existing’ has held back development motivation on Foss Federated Communication alternatives.

    When they go public only good things will happen for projects like matrix :)

    I’m very excited!

    • @CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 month ago

      I feel like matrix isn’t a one-to-one replacement. It’s a good slack replacement.

      I haven’t used matrix enough to know for sure but does it have the discord equivalent of servers?

      • @WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        those are called spaces there. but there’s no flexible roles system. also no hop-on voice channels yet, but that’s a client feature so maybe that’s a bit different

    • Possibly linux
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Matrix is cool but it really suffers from complexity.

      The spec is a mess because they keep expanding it.

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 month ago

    if discord is going public they don’t need my turbo sub anymore

    • @GaMEChld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 month ago

      Cancelled mine when they redesigned the mobile app anyway. I don’t want a different interface on mobile vs desktop. I want a unified experience, which was their original purpose.

  • Matt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 month ago

    Matrix is the way. It’s federated and you can have your own server.

    • poVoq
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 month ago

      Jitsi-meet is already using xmpp under the hood.

      But there are some efforts to add multi-user video calls to full xmpp clients as well. Dino can already do it for a while, and Movim and Libervia recently added experimental support.

      Its not quite a full Discord replacement, but for private groups it works quite well.

      • @corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        Isn’t the video the jingle part that Google added to jabber originally (before it dumped everything to remake it from the group up about 4 more times like a GSoC crossed over with groundhogDay)?

        • poVoq
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 month ago

          Today xmpp uses a distant relative of those original jingle specifications, which have been modernized to use Webrtc.

        • poVoq
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 month ago

          Movim does, for Libervia and Dino I am not 100% sure right now, but at least for Libervia the browser version should have it as it is really more of a general Webrtc browser feature than client specific.

  • @pory@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 month ago

    it’s Element/Matrix if we’re lucky. Revolt is just another Discord - surely this single company will last! With Element/Matrix being an open protocol, it won’t be a “platform” you have to leave when it goes corporate.

      • @UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        Thank you for the recommendation. I tried element a while ago and found it lacking. Matrix must be the way forward. Disregarding IRC of course.

    • @ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 month ago

      Sadly I found out yesterday:

      Matrix is not a community-based software, it was born [00] in Amdocs [01], a multinational corporation founded in Israel.

      https://hackea.org/notas/matrix.html

      Many were claiming its impossible to get contributions merged as well.

      I would be happy to find out this information is wrong or outdated.

      • drkt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        That doesn’t really change that it’s one company hosting it. Unless you’re willing to make 10 different accounts because your super-FOSS friends aren’t willing to join each others instances?

        • db0
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 month ago

          I guess the easy solution here to to make it use oauth2 authentication. Then you can just authenticate using one account elsewhere. If fediverse services also at some point become oauth2 providers, then even better.

          • Tekhne
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 month ago

            That’s still not a solution. That entails non unified communication, access, and search. Making it easy to log in to others still doesn’t solve easy sharing between others. Also oauth2 is a pain to set up, and many people hosting their own instance aren’t going to bother.

            • db0
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 month ago

              Sorry but what exactly do you communicate and access between discord servers? Are you talking about PMs which are by default independent of servers?

              Unified search could easily be achieved through third party tools at the least, like for IRC. I don’t think even discord has unified search between servers.

              • Tekhne
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 month ago

                Oh hey, you’re totally right, that’s crazy. I use Beeper (hosted matrix setup) to aggregate my chats and I guess I’ve always been using that to search across all servers without realizing. Fully thought the DM search would also search across servers.

                DMs are definitely also another case though - you can’t easily DM people on another server if that requires you to log into another server.

                • db0
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  01 month ago

                  That’s true about DM, however DMs are not a core use-case for discord-like services. It’s the group/voice chats etc. I could see a workaround like lemmy does, where if you want to DM a user in another server, you might be able to do it through your fediverse instance (i.e. a DM simply has your fediverse instance DM their fediverse instance), but I’m sure there can be more elegant things like. However DMs by themselves are a weird thing by themselves, so much so, that even bluesky had to bolt DMs on-top and outside of their protocol.

      • @renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        Yes, which is good, but the lack of federation is a deal-breaker. It means that you either:

        1. Use their servers - This requires entrusting them with your communities, just like Discord.
        2. Host your own private instance - You can control it, but the lack of federation means it’ll be isolated from communicating with other communities. This makes it really difficult to convince people to use your self-hosted servers.

        Until Revolt adds a way for different instances to federate, Matrix is really the only other option.

        • @aleq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 month ago

          My experience with Matrix is that the federation itself is a deal breaker. I have a pretty beefy server and good connection which was getting ddosed by running Matrix and timing out on so many requests for avatars/profiles etc. Maybe I did something wrong, but the whole experience rendered me quite skeptical to the viability of it as a federated chat.

          That said I’ve had nothing but good experiences using it with big servers set up by pros.

          • @hobovision@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 month ago

            Why would an optional feature be a deal breaker?

            It also seems like an issue that could be easily solved by whitelisting.

            • JackbyDev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Yes, which is good, but the lack of federation is a deal-breaker.

              The federation itself is a deal breaker

              Why would an optional feature be a deal breaker?

              Because the person they’re responding to said the lack of the optional feature was a deal breaker for them on a different piece of software.

              • @pseudonaut@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                I’m might be being dense but… Still: why would an optional feature be a dealbreaker? You just restated, you didn’t address the confusing logic.

          • @renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 month ago

            I get why Federation can cause issues (most of the time it’s moderation related), but why would an extra option be a deal-breaker? Federation can always be disabled on a per-domain basis if you prefer. In fact, I’d argue it’s best practice to only allow domains on a case-by-case basis to prevent spam and abuse.

            On the converse, you can’t enable Federation on a platform that doesn’t have it.

            • @KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              They were talking about matrix itself, not a specific option. And I’m not going to lie, having to hand hold your servers federation choices seems like a hassle. At that point why not just use a self hosted, non federated option?

              • @white_nrdy@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 month ago

                I think the point they’re making is you can effectively have a self hosted non federated option with Matrix. Just disable federation as a whole (which I’m pretty sure is completely possible. Given companies use matrix for comms, and might not want federation, for similar reasons to what is being discussed here)

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        …theoretically for now

        It a centralized server controlled by the devs

      • @waz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        I am certainly not one of the younger folks and had never seen that before. That is awesome, thank you for sharing.

        • @Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 month ago

          Oh man, Basshunter was huge in the chronically-online gamer space in the 2000s. His other songs are pretty good too.

          To put it in perspective, the fact that they’re gaming on laptops and LCD monitors was an enviable flex when his songs released.

      • @BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        I still have my copy. I cannot believe that song is like, 18 years old now. It was such a staple of my college experience.

      • EchoCranium
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        Used to use Vent playing Eve Online 19 years ago. Worked great back then. Apparently it’s still around, but still no Linux support after all these years.

  • shym3q
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I’ve started my self-hosting journey having Matrix in mind - especially the Matrix bridges to cut off the need to use social media clients like Discord.

    Today, I’m slowly convicting my friends to join my instance. So far, that’s just one of the closest ones (still win for me).

    I hope one day decentralization in social media would take off!

    • @rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 month ago

      I JUST managed to get my closest ring outside my family to join Signal.

      We have a total of 7 people now.

      I’d light up a server and host matrix/frendica/lemmy/mastodon/headscale in an instant if I thought I could get those 7 to join.

    • MrSpArkle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 month ago

      Most of the discords I’m on never use screen share for anything.

    • loiakdsf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 month ago

      honestly that isnthe only thing that stopd me from going all in on teamspeak/mumble

      i just need a screen sharing solution (not necessarily built into those tools)

    • enkers
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The problem is that performant screenshare (to multiple users) more or less requires infrastructure. That requires money, and it’s impossible to compete on price with services that have the VC-enshitification model.

      You can get around this in a few ways, but they’re all tradeoffs that are in some way or other worse than discord.

      • P2P - sacrifice latency, reliability
      • direct multi-stream - sacrifice PC performance and/or bitrate
      • paid infrastructure - sacrifice money
      • @foggenbooty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        I think P2P is still the way to go. Sure it’s not perfect, but it’s simpler and by it’s very nature doesn’t require the infrastructure we know will be a problem.

        Plus, don’t forget screen sharing in discord isn’t very good as is (720p30) if you’re not a paid user.

    • riquisimo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 month ago

      What if you had OBS create a “camera” of your screen, and then use that through video chat?