• JupiterSnarl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 months ago

    I have a 20ish year old history in my Gmail account organized in labels and all that. I wonder if it will be viable to migrate?

    • @TheEntity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      Considering labels are very non-standard, which caused trouble over IMAP since forever, I wouldn’t count on that part.

      • @Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        Labels are displayed as folders on IMAP, which means that a single message could appear in multiple folders. Are there any other problems you’re talking about?

        • @TheEntity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          07 months ago

          One of the problems that annoyed me in the past is the complexity and ambiguity of deleting an email over IMAP. Depending on whether it’s the last label of the deleted email, deleting an email from a label’s directory either removes a label from this email, or actually deletes the email.

    • @dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      Please archive shit. It’s OK to save old data, but not on the service. There are ways. Even banks, the most obsessive and legally strapped data hoarders keep their 5+ year old data in deep cold storage, away from the active services. 99.9^% of information that old won’t be looked at by anyone.

      • @Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        Not true.

        It’s much easier to keep old data in active storage where it can be classified, searched, and have retention/deletion policies applied. Moving it elsewhere makes it more likely you’ll just hang onto it forever while not using it at all.

          • @Brkdncr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            07 months ago

            I don’t disagree that you should set up retention policies to delete old email, I disagree that you should remove old emails from primary service/storage.

            I actually did need a 15 year old email a few months ago. I don’t recall what I needed, but I then set up a retention policy to delete old stuff.

            • @dustyData@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Why not having an archive of exclusively warranties? Emails can be downloaded, indexed and compressed. I agree on keeping archives of old stuff. But emails used as cloud drives are a huge problem for IT and security reasons. A legal is better and facilitates backup, encryption and much more accessibility.

  • arch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 months ago

    I was thinking ab this being april fool bcz it’s posted on 1st…

  • @Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 months ago

    I think it’s incredibly important that people know, with absolute certainty, whether or not the new Mozilla/Firefox privacy policy in any way applies to / covers such a service.

    I’m not saying I know the answer- What I’m saying without a concrete, permanently applied answer it’s not even considerable.

    • RachelOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      There is no email service that exists without a terms of use and privacy policy. I still feel everyone overreacted about Firefox. It’s funnier how many people said they switched to Brave because of it and all the super shady stuff Brave has done.

      • @Reygle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        Firefox/Mozilla operated without any of the new additions for nearly the entire history of the internet until this year. If anything, “over”-reacting to the new policies was too weak a reaction. You do you and all, but I’ll agree to very strongly disagree.

      • @britaliope@kourjetez.bzh
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        at exists without a terms of use and privacy policy. I still feel everyone overreacted about Firefox. It’s funnier how many people said they switched to Brave because of it and all the super shady stuff Brave has done.

        Being angry at the Mozilla foundation for those changes is understandable. Switching to Brave because of it is plain stupid.

        • @Sequence5666@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          07 months ago

          I do think the brave devs or teams starting spreading the “switch to brave” as a growth hack. No right minded person would pick brave over ff. Maybe librewolf sure.

    • @infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You can’t know that with absolute certainty. Sorry, but if you’re using someone elses server for your communications and they’re not end to end encrypted, you should just assume that they can and do read your emails, and act accordingly.

    • @SaltSong@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      What is it that you’re concerned about? Assume that I have no idea what either the new or old Mozilla privacy policy is, please. I tend to assume that all such are a pack of lies and everything is spying on me.

  • @commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 months ago

    I’d consider it. If they host things outside of the US/start moving operations overseas, it’d be a lot more interesting. I sub to Proton for email, VPN, and drive support. Still hoping someday for proper Linux drive support so Mozilla/Thunderbird can target that

  • Ray1992xD
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 months ago

    No matter how much I hate Mozilla’s new path, companies like this challenging big tech are bold and have a lot of courage. If I set aside my personal op opinions about Mozilla, I actually admire them for this. They can actually dent big tech with funding from big tech itself.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      For now, they’re better than Google. I have some bad opinions about them, but anything better than Google competing with Google is an improvement.

    • @danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      I keep hearing a lot of negative comments about Mozilla lately. I’m wondering if this move is more in line with then just turning into another google rather than disrupting the marketplace.

        • @mke@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          If they’re user funded, their incentives are fundamentally different from Google’s. Even thinking as a business, it makes no sense to enshittify the way Google does. It’s a different choice, even if it’s not the choice you wanted.

      • ☂️-
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        yes but this takes time. its great to have alternatives in the meantime.

    • @0x0@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      It’s a saturated market and email is starting to disappear (it’ll take years, but the signs are there).
      They’d be better using it on the browser and ditching other products.

      • @1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        No its never going to disappear. If you are referring to people using slack and chat apps, those are locked in walled gardens where your messages cant ever leave.

        Email can be moved anywhere easily.

        • chaosCruiser
          link
          fedilink
          English
          07 months ago

          On top of that, people still use email to sign up for these gardens. Technically, you could use your phone number too. I wonder how far could you take this idea of living completely without email.

          Job applications, and several other sign ins still depend on email, so that’s going to be a bit of a hitch.

          • @fishpen0@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            07 months ago

            Yeah and then we can really go hard destroying the lives of people without phone access.

            I work for a healthcare company that serves the under privileged and right now in most cities it’s easier to guarantee someone has email than a consistent phone number thanks to free WiFi hotspots. You can miss a phone payment and still read your email even if you’re cut off from cellular service.

            • chaosCruiser
              link
              fedilink
              English
              07 months ago

              Oh, that’s a very good point! Makes you look at this proposal in a completely different way.

      • Lka1988
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        email is starting to disappear

        The fuck it is lol, do you have any idea how much email is used in literally everything? How old are you?

      • Kualdir
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        Any business2business or consumer2business communication will likely still happen over email for a very long time

        • @0x0@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          07 months ago

          It’s insecure by default and Kids These Days™ prefer messaging apps, which have boomed in the last decade.
          Time will tell.

          • @JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            07 months ago

            What do you make of the use of email in the business world? You’re right that quite a bit of that has turned into instant messaging as well, ie I text my boss instead of sending them mail but it definitely feels like that’s going away a lot slower if not expanding

            • @PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              07 months ago

              Email is a must for between businesses. Having said that, lots of internal communication is findingther channels, like Teams, Slack, and so on.

              • @fishpen0@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                07 months ago

                We actually heavily rely on connected channels to talk to most of our vendors now. Once you are on enterprise level support pretty much every vendor gives you a dedicated slack or teams channel.

                It’s great since people come and go and we don’t lose our vendor comms history in random inboxes or have someone not CCd on. Any vendor we have linked is also one less vendor someone is likely to be phished talking to the wrong person on the wrong email. For support tickets there’s no wrapping and encrypting shit steps to send critical info over email, we use the slack channel. It really solves a lot of BS

      • moitoi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        Email won’t disappear sooner or later. It’s a huge part of communication between companies, nonprofit, state, etc. It may be less between people or with consumers. But, it still is widely use otherwise.

  • @Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 months ago

    Sounded great until the “assist” ai feature. I friggin hate Gemini in gmail so any other kind of ai is an automatic nogo for me

  • @werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 months ago

    Here’s what I want… I leave a computer on at home and it checks my email. I get emails from it at my phone. No setup. Make it work like Sinkthing used to work. I don’t want cloud anything. Fucking backup nightmare where my shit ends up kidnapped by a company for monthly ransom.

  • Leraje
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 months ago

    Thunderbird Pro will apparently be:

    This email thing plus Thunderbird Send (which is basically https://send.vis.ee/), Thunderbird Appointment - a scheduling tool and Thunderbird Assist, which is:

    “…at least for now, being cautiously labeled as “an experiment” that will allow users to take advantage of AI features within their email. However, the goal is to be lightweight enough that the language models can be run locally on a user’s PC in the interest of privacy. This service is being developed in partnership with Flower AI, which leverages Nvidia’s confidential compute to provide private remote processing in the event a user’s PC isn’t powerful enough. Sipes emphasizes that any remote processing features attached to Thunderbird Assist will always be optional, in the interest of ensuring complete user privacy.”

    So AI shit that nobody asked for or wants.

      • @mke@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        They said it will be opt-in and are trying to make it local-first. Their provider(?) apparently allows fallback to nvidia cloud compute when the hardware can’t handle it.

        I’m not using AI to write my fucking emails, regardless. Just wanted to let people know.

        P.s. I’m dumb, skipped over quote in parent comment. Point is, there’s more to the service than optional AI bullshit, and you shouldn’t have to disable it.

    • @freely1333@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      This sounds like proton except I haven’t heard a thing about cost or encryption which leads me to believe you will pay with your data and there will be no encryption.

      Proton is the bare minimum for email services. Email should be fully redone at its core.

    • Lka1988
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      "[…] This service is being developed in partnership with Flower AI, which leverages Nvidia’s confidential compute to provide private remote processing in the event a user’s PC isn’t powerful enough. Sipes emphasizes that any remote processing features attached to Thunderbird Assist will always be optional, in the interest of ensuring complete user privacy.”

      That’s a lot of words to say “we made an AI that totally won’t suck up your data, trust me bro”

  • @gamer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 months ago

    Lol sure destroy all the trust with your users THEN launch an email service. Hard pass fro me.

    I guarantee you they’re already planning to train an LLM on everybody’s emails, or at least sell them to AI companies doing training.

  • @A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 months ago

    welp I signed up for the waitlist.

    I’ll use it for a disposable email at first, and if it endures and does well I’ll move my main shit off to it.

  • Geetnerd
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 months ago

    I’m listening…

    But how is a small non-profit going to afford a free email service? Ads in every email?

    • RachelOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      Based on what I’ve seen in their forums it will be a paid service. I think it will be free at first for beta testers but I assume they are targeting people who currently use services like Proton.

      • Geetnerd
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        Thanks for the info.

        But I think they’ll still need an ad driven free version to gain acceptance.

  • @magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I hope to god one day the developers at Mozilla finally get tired of this shit and fork everything under a new org.

    Fuck off with more services and give me my integrated FTP client back. No one who uses Mozilla software wants more cloud shit or online services from Mozilla.

    • Lka1988
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      integrated FTP client

      Why though? SFTP is leagues better.

      • @magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        For transfers between systems you own yes, but when grabbing a Linux iso from a public server FTP works fine.

        For years Firefox allowed you to crawl FTP sites natively.

    • @mke@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      No one who uses Mozilla software wants more cloud shit or online services from Mozilla.

      I don’t think that’s unanimous. I’d like to use Firefox Relay, myself, and I’m willing to give thundermail a chance.

      Used to think I’d go full Proton eventually, but leaning more towards a diverse set of service providers, nowadays. It’s also my hope that these services allow Mozilla to depend less on companies like Google, and more on the users they ought to serve, which would be healthier for the org and better for users.

    • @ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      Tell me you have no meaningful impact on the world without telling me you have no meaningful impact on the world.

    • Rose56
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      You are like those people that always say “Do people still use INPUT SOMETHING”. Do you text or call only? What about your work? you call or send a text instead of email ? maybe drop of some files instead of emailing them? I have so many questions.

    • 74 183.84
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      The people who dont are usually old as people who dont need it anymore or kids

      • @BangCrash@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        If only they could develop a federated short message system.

        Messenger/WhatsApp/slack messaging style but federated like email

        • @ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          07 months ago

          Email is federated, it’s just not really a medium people want to limit to 500 chars…

          Nothing at all stopping you from writing a client that only allows 500 char messages in and out.

          Someone even built a chat system that used email under the hood.

        • RachelOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          07 months ago

          Email was originally one of the first federated systems. Anyone can host a server and send messages back and forth from other servers with a set standard. That basically is federation.

          • @BangCrash@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            07 months ago

            Email still has it’s place. So changing the interface will likely make email less useable.

            Ideally something alongside email but not email.

  • Dr. Moose
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 months ago

    Yet thunderbird still can’t single click open an email in a new window. If I recall correctly the request has been filed in 2014 or smt 💀

      • Dr. Moose
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Nope, still requires double click.

        It’s almost like you didn’t read my comment and went straight to angry. This has been suggested for years with 0 response from Thunderbird team and there’s no way to extend it without forking and patching everything yourself.

        • @dbbljack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          07 months ago

          If you’ve done nothing but complain for 14 years then I’m glad you still have to double click.