Title is quite self-explanatory, reason I wonder is because every now and then I think to myself “maybe distro X is good, maybe I should try it at some point”, but then I think a bit more and realise it kind of doesn’t make a difference - the only thing I feel kinda matters is rolling vs non-rolling release patterns.

My guiding principles when choosing distro are that I run arch on my desktop because it’s what I’m used to (and AUR is nice to have), and Debian on servers because some people said it’s good and I the non-rolling release gives me peace of mind that I don’t have to update very often. But I could switch both of these out and I really don’t think it would make a difference at all.

  • pmarg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 hours ago

    I have been using Linux since early March 2020. I chose Debian/Ubuntu-based distributions for two main reasons: stability and my strong familiarity with the APT package manager. The APT man page is deeply ingrained in my memory.

    Today I run Debian Stable/Testing and also Unstable, on all my computers 4/4 on Debian!

  • Billegh
    link
    fedilink
    116 days ago

    Slackware: because I’m old and arch is too trendy.

      • Billegh
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Let’s be honest: nearly all of them now are windowslike girly distros…

    • @floo@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 days ago

      Geez, I haven’t heard of someone running Slackware in at least 15 years. I mean, I know it’s still around, I just haven’t heard anyone say they were running it.

  • sbird
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Linux Mint is a nice and easy distro that is quite good :D

    • MrFunkEdude
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36 days ago

      I’ve been using Mint for a year now and I just got a second laptop and the first thing I did was Wipe Windows 11 off of it and install Mint.

      It does everything I need it too.

      • sbird
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 days ago

        honestly mint really a very easy distro, I enjoyed using it too. Fedora and other distros also seem pretty cool

  • Dogiedog64
    link
    fedilink
    76 days ago

    I recently moved to Fedora KDE Plasma after years on W10, simply because I don’t want to use W11 and its AI bullshit. So far, it’s been a great time, and I haven’t noticed any major performance issues, so I’m happy with it. Having to update everything every few days is pretty novel though, and ‘sudo dnf update -y’ makes me feel like Hackerman, king of all Hackers. I think I like the customization options most though. I get way more control over what happens on my PC than W10 ever gave me, and it’s all wrapped in a very user-friendly GUI. Overall 8.5-9/10.

    • @Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      yay I want to install Fedora Plasma when I get a new drive, see if I can gradually switch (for real this time)… Plasma has a new pen tablet utility for Wayland, and since I use my tablet exclusively… when my Windows 10 is EOL I will switch for sure. Good to know it runs well for you

      • Dogiedog64
        link
        fedilink
        36 days ago

        Yeah, I also use a pen tablet for some stuff, and it handles it decently well. One issue I’ve run into with it is that if I turn my monitor off while the tablet is plugged in, there’s like a 50/50 chance the monitor won’t load video unless I turn the tablet on too. It’s funky. Otherwise, getting my RTX4070 up and running wasn’t too hard. It’s a good distro for idiots (me).

  • @aspoleczny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    66 days ago

    OpenSUSE Tumbleweed. Recently I bought cheap Surface-like x86 tablet on a rather recent hardware, and running Debian and its cousins required more tinkering than I was willing to do, so I decided to go with a more modern rolling release. Tried Arch for a few months, bricked it from mixing stable and testing branches, tried Fedora, and finally settled in Tumbleweed. I like it for being on the bleeding edge and exceptionally stable at the same time, perhaps thanks to robust OpenSUSE Build Service automated testing. And it is from a European company, that can’t hurt.

  • @WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    97 days ago

    Guix because I love the idea behind Nix but Nixlang is the most painful language I’ve ever had to type out.

    • shmanio
      link
      fedilink
      26 days ago

      How long have you used it and how is it?

      I’m pretty curious about those kinds of distros, and don’t really like how nixos is completely hosted on github (and all the drama that constantly comes from the community, and the bad documentation for many things, …).

      However, guix seems such a niche project that I feel like it can’t really be used.

      • @WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        36 days ago

        About a year and a half.

        To be honest it’s not “easy” to use. The guiding principle behind mainline packages is that everything has to be built from source, so most somewhat unpopular things are missing from the mainline channels.

        To use it like any other distro you’re going to need to learn how to write packages fairly quickly. Luckily the main draw of guix is the entire OS being based on guile so once you get a little under your belt you can just read the specs from other channels to see how a package is written.

        Took me maybe a week to start writing guix packages.

        There’s also The toybox

      • @WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        26 days ago

        Some additional nice things about guix:

        Everything is guile. The system definition, the service definitions for shepherd, everything.

        Shepherd is hands down the best init program I’ve ever used. It’s just incredibly simplistic but because it just runs the guile definition you give it, you can do some incredibly complex things that systemd etc. can do as well.

        The OS documentation is built into the distro, with “info guix” you get reams of configuration information for the distro without ever needing to look it up online.

  • @zebidiah@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    107 days ago

    I run SteamOS on desktop hardware because I hate windows and it solves almost every Linux gaming problem out of the box…

    • @Gg901@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      36 days ago

      Is there an official build for general release, or are you running a steam image built for a handheld?

      • @zebidiah@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        14 days ago

        Yep! It’s the SteamOS 3 beta… It’s got some bugs and some weirdness to it, but it’s not terrible at all

      • @zebidiah@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        14 days ago

        Steam deck SteamOS iso installer! It’s actually surprisingly stable for basic tasks but it is pretty locked down so you can’t really break it unless you really try. And it seems to run better if your pairing it with amd cpu/gpu hardware

  • شاهد على إبادة
    link
    fedilink
    66 days ago
    • SteamOS: because it came with my Steam Deck.
    • LinuxMint: because it is an Ubuntu-derivative and widely used which makes finding solutions and packages easier and I like MATE.
  • @VitabytesDev@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Arch: I have the most up to date computer in the whole world, I have the AUR, no one can stop me

    switches to Debian

    Debian: My packages are so stable, nothing can break the eternal peace of my system’s packages

    switches back to Arch

    • @jim3692@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      26 days ago

      I have Debian on a laptop that I don’t use that much, and I use Nix package manager for managing the apps I use.

      Running Arch was a nightmare, as I was updating once every 1-2 months and I was getting lots of conflicts.

  • @Tapionpoika@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    77 days ago

    I use Mint. I had a phase with different distros, but when I had my son, and he turned 3, I installed Linux Mint for him. Little by little, I started using it myself. Today my son is in the military service and I still use Mint.

  • Captain Aggravated
    link
    fedilink
    English
    87 days ago

    On my main desktop I’m using Fedora KDE. Arrived here by process of elimination.

    Linux Mint Cinnamon didn’t run particularly well with my hardware, I was looking for a distro with decent Wayland support so I could run my high refresh rate monitor properly. So that pretty much meant a switch to KDE. So who’s implementation of KDE?

    I’ve spent much of my time on the Ubuntu side of things, but Canonical has been pulling so much diet Microsoft shit that I’d rather not use any of the *buntus themselves, so Kubuntu is out. Neon? Kubuntu again. I’m not terribly interested in the forks of forks of forks of forks, I’ve been around long enough to go “Remember PeppermintOS? You don’t, okay.” So I’m looking for something fairly near the root of its tree.

    I’ve never really seen the appeal of Arch and every time I’ve tried running Manjaro it failed to function, so forget that. I don’t know shit about SuSe, that basically left Fedora. So here I am.

  • Drunk & Root
    link
    fedilink
    46 days ago

    i use gentoo because i love the package manager and how in control i am of my desktop and for servers even though not linux ive been using open bsd because of secure it is and lightweight helps squeeze out little bit more performance from mt shit vps lol

  • Gaxsun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    67 days ago

    EndeavourOS. It’s the only one I tried that worked with my sound card out of the box strangely enough…